[PATCH 00/10] mm: Linux VM Infrastructure to support Memory Power Management
Ankita Garg
ankita at in.ibm.com
Thu Jun 30 01:11:23 EDT 2011
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 01:11:00PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Dave Hansen <dave at linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> >
> > It's also going to be a pain to track kernel references. On x86, our
>
As Vaidy mentioned, we are only looking at memory being either allocated
or free, as a way to evacuate it. Tracking memory references, no doubt,
is a difficult proposition and might involve a lot of overhead.
> Even if you tracked them what would you do with them?
>
> It's quite hard to stop using arbitary kernel memory (see all the dancing
> memory-failure does)
>
> You need to track the direct accesses to user data which happens
> to be accessed through the direct mapping.
>
> Also it will be always unreliable because this all won't track DMA.
> For that you would also need to track in the dma_* infrastructure,
> which will likely get seriously expensive.
>
--
Regards,
Ankita Garg (ankita at in.ibm.com)
Linux Technology Center
IBM India Systems & Technology Labs,
Bangalore, India
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list