[PATCHv2 0/4] ARM: pmu: improve PMU type identification

Jean Pihet jean.pihet at newoldbits.com
Wed Jun 29 09:32:24 EDT 2011


On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Jamie Iles <jamie at jamieiles.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:36:53AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
Hi Will,

>> Russell,
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:26:22AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 03:40:00PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> > > can be used similarly (the macros make entries look identical apart from the
>> > > {plat,of} prefix). This allows us to stop (ab)using platform_device::id, and
>> > > should allow for easier addition/modification of PMU driver bindings.
>> > >
>> > > BSPs need no longer care about the Type of PMUs they register; as long as a
>> > > binding exists the type will be assigned correctly.
>> >
>> > Could someone please look at adding an entry to the MAINTAINERS file
>> > for the ARM PMU stuff, so we know who should be looking after this stuff?
>>
>> I'm happy to maintain this stuff if nobody has any objections.
>
> No objections from me, I think that sounds like a very good idea!
No objections! I would be glad to lend a hand if neeeded!

Regards,
Jean
>
> Jamie
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list