[PATCH v8 09/12] mmc: block: move error code in issue_rw_rq to a separate function.
Per Forlin
per.forlin at linaro.org
Tue Jun 28 04:11:54 EDT 2011
Break out code without functional changes. This simplifies the code and
makes way for handle two parallel request.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin at linaro.org>
---
drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 220 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
index a0a76f4..7ed2c68 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
@@ -106,6 +106,16 @@ struct mmc_blk_data {
static DEFINE_MUTEX(open_lock);
+enum mmc_blk_status {
+ MMC_BLK_SUCCESS = 0,
+ MMC_BLK_PARTIAL,
+ MMC_BLK_RETRY,
+ MMC_BLK_RETRY_SINGLE,
+ MMC_BLK_DATA_ERR,
+ MMC_BLK_CMD_ERR,
+ MMC_BLK_ABORT,
+};
+
module_param(perdev_minors, int, 0444);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(perdev_minors, "Minors numbers to allocate per device");
@@ -812,6 +822,95 @@ static inline void mmc_apply_rel_rw(struct mmc_blk_request *brq,
R1_CC_ERROR | /* Card controller error */ \
R1_ERROR) /* General/unknown error */
+int mmc_blk_err_check(struct mmc_blk_request *brq,
+ struct request *req,
+ struct mmc_card *card,
+ struct mmc_blk_data *md)
+{
+ int ret = MMC_BLK_SUCCESS;
+
+ /*
+ * sbc.error indicates a problem with the set block count
+ * command. No data will have been transferred.
+ *
+ * cmd.error indicates a problem with the r/w command. No
+ * data will have been transferred.
+ *
+ * stop.error indicates a problem with the stop command. Data
+ * may have been transferred, or may still be transferring.
+ */
+ if (brq->sbc.error || brq->cmd.error || brq->stop.error) {
+ switch (mmc_blk_cmd_recovery(card, req, brq)) {
+ case ERR_RETRY:
+ return MMC_BLK_RETRY;
+ case ERR_ABORT:
+ return MMC_BLK_ABORT;
+ case ERR_CONTINUE:
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Check for errors relating to the execution of the
+ * initial command - such as address errors. No data
+ * has been transferred.
+ */
+ if (brq->cmd.resp[0] & CMD_ERRORS) {
+ pr_err("%s: r/w command failed, status = %#x\n",
+ req->rq_disk->disk_name, brq->cmd.resp[0]);
+ return MMC_BLK_ABORT;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Everything else is either success, or a data error of some
+ * kind. If it was a write, we may have transitioned to
+ * program mode, which we have to wait for it to complete.
+ */
+ if (!mmc_host_is_spi(card->host) && rq_data_dir(req) != READ) {
+ u32 status;
+ do {
+ int err = get_card_status(card, &status, 5);
+ if (err) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "%s: error %d requesting status\n",
+ req->rq_disk->disk_name, err);
+ return MMC_BLK_CMD_ERR;
+ }
+ /*
+ * Some cards mishandle the status bits,
+ * so make sure to check both the busy
+ * indication and the card state.
+ */
+ } while (!(status & R1_READY_FOR_DATA) ||
+ (R1_CURRENT_STATE(status) == R1_STATE_PRG));
+ }
+
+ if (brq->data.error) {
+ pr_err("%s: error %d transferring data, sector %u, nr %u, cmd response %#x, card status %#x\n",
+ req->rq_disk->disk_name, brq->data.error,
+ (unsigned)blk_rq_pos(req),
+ (unsigned)blk_rq_sectors(req),
+ brq->cmd.resp[0], brq->stop.resp[0]);
+
+ if (rq_data_dir(req) == READ) {
+ if (brq->data.blocks > 1) {
+ /* Redo read one sector at a time */
+ pr_warning("%s: retrying using single block read\n",
+ req->rq_disk->disk_name);
+ return MMC_BLK_RETRY_SINGLE;
+ }
+ return MMC_BLK_DATA_ERR;
+ } else {
+ return MMC_BLK_CMD_ERR;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (ret == MMC_BLK_SUCCESS &&
+ blk_rq_bytes(req) != brq->data.bytes_xfered)
+ ret = MMC_BLK_PARTIAL;
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static void mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(struct mmc_queue_req *mqrq,
struct mmc_card *card,
int disable_multi,
@@ -948,6 +1047,7 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
struct mmc_card *card = md->queue.card;
struct mmc_blk_request *brq = &mq->mqrq_cur->brq;
int ret = 1, disable_multi = 0, retry = 0;
+ enum mmc_blk_status status;
do {
mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(mq->mqrq_cur, card, disable_multi, mq);
@@ -955,99 +1055,41 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
mmc_queue_bounce_post(mq->mqrq_cur);
- /*
- * sbc.error indicates a problem with the set block count
- * command. No data will have been transferred.
- *
- * cmd.error indicates a problem with the r/w command. No
- * data will have been transferred.
- *
- * stop.error indicates a problem with the stop command. Data
- * may have been transferred, or may still be transferring.
- */
- if (brq->sbc.error || brq->cmd.error || brq->stop.error) {
- switch (mmc_blk_cmd_recovery(card, req, brq)) {
- case ERR_RETRY:
- if (retry++ < 5)
- continue;
- case ERR_ABORT:
- goto cmd_abort;
- case ERR_CONTINUE:
+ status = mmc_blk_err_check(brq, req, card, md);
+ switch (status) {
+ case MMC_BLK_SUCCESS:
+ case MMC_BLK_PARTIAL:
+ /*
+ * A block was successfully transferred.
+ */
+ spin_lock_irq(&md->lock);
+ ret = __blk_end_request(req, 0,
+ brq->data.bytes_xfered);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&md->lock);
+ break;
+ case MMC_BLK_CMD_ERR:
+ goto cmd_err;
+ case MMC_BLK_RETRY_SINGLE:
+ disable_multi = 1;
+ break;
+ case MMC_BLK_RETRY:
+ if (retry++ < 5)
break;
- }
- }
-
- /*
- * Check for errors relating to the execution of the
- * initial command - such as address errors. No data
- * has been transferred.
- */
- if (brq->cmd.resp[0] & CMD_ERRORS) {
- pr_err("%s: r/w command failed, status = %#x\n",
- req->rq_disk->disk_name, brq->cmd.resp[0]);
+ case MMC_BLK_ABORT:
goto cmd_abort;
+ case MMC_BLK_DATA_ERR:
+ /*
+ * After an error, we redo I/O one sector at a
+ * time, so we only reach here after trying to
+ * read a single sector.
+ */
+ spin_lock_irq(&md->lock);
+ ret = __blk_end_request(req, -EIO,
+ brq->data.blksz);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&md->lock);
+ break;
}
- /*
- * Everything else is either success, or a data error of some
- * kind. If it was a write, we may have transitioned to
- * program mode, which we have to wait for it to complete.
- */
- if (!mmc_host_is_spi(card->host) && rq_data_dir(req) != READ) {
- u32 status;
- do {
- int err = get_card_status(card, &status, 5);
- if (err) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "%s: error %d requesting status\n",
- req->rq_disk->disk_name, err);
- goto cmd_err;
- }
- /*
- * Some cards mishandle the status bits,
- * so make sure to check both the busy
- * indication and the card state.
- */
- } while (!(status & R1_READY_FOR_DATA) ||
- (R1_CURRENT_STATE(status) == R1_STATE_PRG));
- }
-
- if (brq->data.error) {
- pr_err("%s: error %d transferring data, sector %u, nr %u, cmd response %#x, card status %#x\n",
- req->rq_disk->disk_name, brq->data.error,
- (unsigned)blk_rq_pos(req),
- (unsigned)blk_rq_sectors(req),
- brq->cmd.resp[0], brq->stop.resp[0]);
-
- if (rq_data_dir(req) == READ) {
- if (brq->data.blocks > 1) {
- /* Redo read one sector at a time */
- pr_warning("%s: retrying using single block read\n",
- req->rq_disk->disk_name);
- disable_multi = 1;
- continue;
- }
-
- /*
- * After an error, we redo I/O one sector at a
- * time, so we only reach here after trying to
- * read a single sector.
- */
- spin_lock_irq(&md->lock);
- ret = __blk_end_request(req, -EIO,
- brq->data.blksz);
- spin_unlock_irq(&md->lock);
- continue;
- } else {
- goto cmd_err;
- }
- }
-
- /*
- * A block was successfully transferred.
- */
- spin_lock_irq(&md->lock);
- ret = __blk_end_request(req, 0, brq->data.bytes_xfered);
- spin_unlock_irq(&md->lock);
} while (ret);
return 1;
--
1.7.4.1
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list