[PATCH 00/10] Enhance /dev/mem to allow read/write of arbitrary physical addresses
rmallon at gmail.com
Sun Jun 19 21:02:31 EDT 2011
On 20/06/11 10:52, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:46:08AM +1000, Ryan Mallon wrote:
>> On 20/06/11 10:42, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 09:02:17AM +1000, Ryan Mallon wrote:
>>>> There are drivers where this makes sense. For example an FPGA device
>>>> with a proprietary register layout on the memory bus can be done this
>>>> way. The FPGA can simply be mapped in user-space via /dev/mem and
>>>> handled there. If the device requires no access other than memory bus
>>>> reads and writes then writing a custom char device driver just to get an
>>>> mmap function seems a bit overkill.
>>> Calling a 30 line device driver "overkill" might in itself be overkill?
>> I mean overkill in the sense of having to write the driver at all. Why
>> write a 30 line driver just to re-implement some functionality of
> Because it pushes the tradeoff in the right direction. Somebody wants
> to do something weird is a little inconvenienced vs protecting the vast
> majority of users from some security escalation problems.
How does it protect against security escalation? A process mapping a
region either from /dev/mem or from some custom char device can't escape
that region right? In either case you need root privileges to make the
mapping in the first place.
> Besides, if you have a real bus with discoverable regions
> (like PCI BARs), the bus should have sysfs entries like
> /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:06\:06.0/resource0 that can be mmaped.
> Then there's no need for a device driver at all, *and* the privilege
> escalation isn't achievable.
> Of course, most embedded architectures have crap discoverability.
Which is also where devices like FPGAs tend to exist :-).
More information about the linux-arm-kernel