[PATCH v2 4/4] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: extend card_detect and write_protect support for mx5

[Wolfram Sang]

> Sorry.  I had some reason for moving esdhc_pltfm_get_ro around.  We
> can not keep the existing approach (what I said above).  For mx51
> babbage example, esdhc1 uses internal WP while esdhc2 uses gpio WP.
> If we have esdhc_pltfm_get_ro handle gpio only and assign it to
> sdhci_esdhc_ops.get_ro in .probe only when wp_type is ESDHC_WP_GPIO,
> that works for esdhc2 but breaks esdhc1 WP function.  So no, I will
> not change my code except adding NONE case handling there.

Ok, fine with me. Thanks for checking!

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20110615/d5cff7fc/attachment.sig>