[MPCore Watchdog]: Convert from misc_dev to dynamic device node.
Jamie Iles
jamie at jamieiles.com
Tue Jun 14 19:48:58 EDT 2011
Hi Peter,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 04:29:26PM -0700, Peter Fordham wrote:
> The current MPCore watchdog driver uses a misc_dev device node.
> This patch changes it to use dynamically allocated device numbers.
I'm not sure that this is the correct thing to do. All other watchdog devices
use a miscdevice with a major:minor of 10:130, is there a specific reason
that this node needs to be dynamic?
Also few other comments inline.
Jamie
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/mpcore_wdt.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/mpcore_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/mpcore_wdt.c
> index 2b4af22..f6afc20 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/mpcore_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/mpcore_wdt.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/cdev.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
>
> #include <asm/smp_twd.h>
>
> @@ -42,6 +44,9 @@ struct mpcore_wdt {
> int irq;
> unsigned int perturb;
> char expect_close;
> + struct cdev cdev;
> + struct class *class;
> + dev_t number;
It looks like tabs have been converted to spaces here.
> };
>
> static struct platform_device *mpcore_wdt_dev;
> @@ -318,12 +323,6 @@ static const struct file_operations mpcore_wdt_fops = {
> .release = mpcore_wdt_release,
> };
>
> -static struct miscdevice mpcore_wdt_miscdev = {
> - .minor = WATCHDOG_MINOR,
> - .name = "watchdog",
> - .fops = &mpcore_wdt_fops,
> -};
> -
> static int __devinit mpcore_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
> {
> struct mpcore_wdt *wdt;
> @@ -358,14 +357,15 @@ static int __devinit mpcore_wdt_probe(struct
> platform_device *dev)
> goto err_free;
> }
>
> - mpcore_wdt_miscdev.parent = &dev->dev;
> - ret = misc_register(&mpcore_wdt_miscdev);
> - if (ret) {
> + ret = alloc_chrdev_region(&wdt->number, 0, 1, "mpcore_wdt");
> + if (ret < 0) {
> dev_printk(KERN_ERR, wdt->dev,
> - "cannot register miscdev on minor=%d (err=%d)\n",
> - WATCHDOG_MINOR, ret);
> + "cannot register with dynamic device number (err=%d)\n", -ret);
> goto err_misc;
> }
> + dev_printk(KERN_INFO, wdt->dev, "using device number %d, %d",
> MAJOR(wdt->number), MINOR(wdt->number));
> +
> + cdev_init(&wdt->cdev, &mpcore_wdt_fops);
>
> ret = request_irq(wdt->irq, mpcore_wdt_fire, IRQF_DISABLED,
> "mpcore_wdt", wdt);
> @@ -379,10 +379,24 @@ static int __devinit mpcore_wdt_probe(struct
> platform_device *dev)
> platform_set_drvdata(dev, wdt);
> mpcore_wdt_dev = dev;
>
> - return 0;
> + ret = cdev_add(&wdt->cdev, wdt->number, 1);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_printk(KERN_ERR, wdt->dev, "failed to add character device\n");
> + goto err_cdev_add;
> + }
>
> + /* create /dev/watchdog
> + * we use udev to make the file
> + */
> + wdt->class = class_create(THIS_MODULE,"watchdog");
> + (void) device_create(wdt->class, wdt->dev,
> wdt->number,NULL,"watchdog");
The return value of class_create() and device_create() should be checked here
and handled appropriately. I believe the sysfs classes are pretty much
deprecated now in preference of a bus too.
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_cdev_add:
> + free_irq(wdt->irq, wdt);
> err_irq:
> - misc_deregister(&mpcore_wdt_miscdev);
> + unregister_chrdev_region (wdt->number, 1);
> err_misc:
> iounmap(wdt->base);
> err_free:
> @@ -395,9 +409,15 @@ static int __devexit mpcore_wdt_remove(struct
> platform_device *dev)
> {
> struct mpcore_wdt *wdt = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
>
> + device_destroy(wdt->class,wdt->number);
> + class_unregister(wdt->class);
> + class_destroy(wdt->class);
class_destroy() calls calls_unregister() internally so you wouldn't need to
call this.
> + cdev_del(&wdt->cdev);
> +
> platform_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
>
> - misc_deregister(&mpcore_wdt_miscdev);
> + unregister_chrdev_region (wdt->number, 1);
>
> mpcore_wdt_dev = NULL;
>
> --
> 1.7.0.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list