[PATCH v2 5/5] spi/ep93xx: add DMA support

[Koul, Vinod]

On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 13:40 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 10:29:45PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 01:18:24PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 10:06:07PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:45:26PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg at iki.fi> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I just realized that once the SPI driver renaming patch (spi: reorganize
> > > > > > drivers) enters linux-next, this patch (which sits on Vinod's tree) will cause
> > > > > > a merge conflict. Any ideas how to avoid it beforehand?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Yes, put the whole series into a separate branch all by itself.  Merge
> > > > > that branch into Vinod's tree and I'll also merge it into spi/next,
> > > > > and I'll fix up the merge conflict when I do.
> > > > 
> > > > More stupid questions: Do you mean that I create a branch in my public
> > > > repository somewhere? If that is the case, then there is a problem that I
> > > > don't have any public repository and I doubt that I get such before linux-next
> > > > is rebuilt.
> > > 
> > > It doesn't have to be your repo.  Vinod could do it, or I could.
> > 
> > Ah, I see.
> > 
> > Would it then be possible that you could do it? Please let me and Vinod know
> > what is needed from us.
> > 
> > And sorry for this mess.
> 
> I'll need an ack from Vinod first for the series so that I can add it
> before I make the commits, but other than that I have no problem doing
> so.
Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul at intel.com>

Let me know which branch you have pushed and I will merge that to my
tree


-- 
~Vinod