[PATCH] dmaengine: pl330: make platform data optional

[Jassi Brar]

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Vinod Koul <vkoul at infradead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 20:00 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring at calxeda.com>
>>
>> The pl330 needs platform data for describing peripheral connections, but
>> some platforms may only support memory to memory dma channels. In this
>> case, we can probe for how many channels there are and don't need the
>> platform data.
>>
>> As memcpy requests don't need channel private data to hold peripheral
>> info, allow private data to be NULL in this case.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring at calxeda.com>
>> Cc: Jassi Brar <jassi.brar at samsung.com>
>> Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul at intel.com>
>> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams at intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/dma/pl330.c |   64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>>  1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> Applied, Thanks

Oops, sorry Rob. I failed to reply as I assured you. I have been just
too deep into other stuff.

>> @@ -717,27 +717,35 @@ pl330_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
>>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pd->channels);
>>
>>       /* Initialize channel parameters */
>> -     for (i = 0; i < pdat->nr_valid_peri; i++) {
>> -             struct dma_pl330_peri *peri = &pdat->peri[i];
>> -             pch = &pdmac->peripherals[i];
>> +     num_chan = max(pdat->nr_valid_peri, (u8)pi->pcfg.num_chan);
Perhaps you need to check against NULL pointer on 'pdat' ?

Rest looks ok.

thnx