[PATCH 07/15] pxa25x_udc: drop support for udc_command

[Felipe Balbi]

Hi,

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:52:47AM +0800, Eric Miao wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
> <dbaryshkov at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 7/9/11, Greg KH <gregkh at suse.de> wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 12:54:43AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 02:34:28PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> >>> > On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:46:16PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >>> > > Hi,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 05:08:33PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
> >>> > > wrote:
> >>> > > > None of pxa25x devices use udc_command() for UDC functionality.
> >>> > > > Stop calling this callback from pxa25x_udc code.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > looks good to me, Greg since this is a big re-work which depends on
> >>> > > parts out of the Gadget Framework, can you take all the patches
> >>> > > straight ? Here's my Acked-by:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi at ti.com>
> >>> >
> >>> > I can't take these, they should go through the gpio subsystem maintainer
> >>> > instead.
> >>>
> >>> But why ? They only touch drivers/usb/gadget/pxa*.c
> >>
> >> All 15 patches?  No they don't they touch all sorts of things.
> >>
> >>> Would it be enough if Grant would Ack them ?
> >>
> >> Sure, but it would be easier if Grant took them all, right?
> >
> > Colleagues, can you please tell me the current status/future of this patches?
> > Are they going to 3.1? 3.2? Should they go via ARM/PXA, via usb? usb-gadget?
> > Via gpio(why?)?? Should I send them to somebody for merging?
> 
> Well, I agree with Dmitry the whole patchset is not related to the GPIO
> subsystem at all. The major cleanup is actually to the PXA machines,
> and touches part of the pxa25x_udc driver. If some one Acks the USB
> part, I can help take the remaining patches.

For the gadget part you can have my Ack. Although I don't have how to
test those patches, they seem simple enough:

Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi at ti.com>

-- 
balbi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20110718/9c8c4546/attachment.sig>