[PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add EPLL clock operations

Kukjin Kim kgene.kim at samsung.com
Mon Jul 18 01:52:03 EDT 2011


Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
> 
> S5PV210 and EXYNOS4 uses similar PLL(PLL46XX) for EPLL.
> So, The EPLL set rate function is duplicated.
> 
> Note: Moved common code to plat-s5p, as commented by Kukjin Kim.
> 
Since if you want to keep this in git log, this should be moved after below
'---' :(

> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen at samsung.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c        |    1 +
>  arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c        |   78
+---------------------------------
>  arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c            |   77
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h |    3 +
>  4 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c
> index feeb27e..7687087 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c
> @@ -1294,6 +1294,7 @@ void __init_or_cpufreq exynos4_setup_clocks(void)
>  				__raw_readl(S5P_VPLL_CON1), pll_4650);
> 
>  	clk_fout_apll.ops = &exynos4_fout_apll_ops;
> +	clk_fout_epll.ops = &pll46xx_epll_ops;
>  	clk_fout_mpll.rate = mpll;
>  	clk_fout_epll.rate = epll;
>  	clk_fout_vpll.rate = vpll;
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c
> index ae72f87..dd77c2c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c
> @@ -979,82 +979,6 @@ static struct clksrc_clk *sysclks[] = {
>  	&clk_sclk_spdif,
>  };
> 
> -static u32 epll_div[][6] = {
> -	{  48000000, 0, 48, 3, 3, 0 },
> -	{  96000000, 0, 48, 3, 2, 0 },
> -	{ 144000000, 1, 72, 3, 2, 0 },
> -	{ 192000000, 0, 48, 3, 1, 0 },
> -	{ 288000000, 1, 72, 3, 1, 0 },
> -	{  32750000, 1, 65, 3, 4, 35127 },
> -	{  32768000, 1, 65, 3, 4, 35127 },
> -	{  45158400, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 },
> -	{  45000000, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 },
> -	{  45158000, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 },
> -	{  49125000, 0, 49, 3, 3, 9961 },
> -	{  49152000, 0, 49, 3, 3, 9961 },
> -	{  67737600, 1, 67, 3, 3, 48366 },
> -	{  67738000, 1, 67, 3, 3, 48366 },
> -	{  73800000, 1, 73, 3, 3, 47710 },
> -	{  73728000, 1, 73, 3, 3, 47710 },
> -	{  36000000, 1, 32, 3, 4, 0 },
> -	{  60000000, 1, 60, 3, 3, 0 },
> -	{  72000000, 1, 72, 3, 3, 0 },
> -	{  80000000, 1, 80, 3, 3, 0 },
> -	{  84000000, 0, 42, 3, 2, 0 },
> -	{  50000000, 0, 50, 3, 3, 0 },
> -};
> -
> -static int s5pv210_epll_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
> -{
> -	unsigned int epll_con, epll_con_k;
> -	unsigned int i;
> -
> -	/* Return if nothing changed */
> -	if (clk->rate == rate)
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	epll_con = __raw_readl(S5P_EPLL_CON);
> -	epll_con_k = __raw_readl(S5P_EPLL_CON1);
> -
> -	epll_con_k &= ~PLL46XX_KDIV_MASK;
> -	epll_con &= ~(1 << 27 |
> -			PLL46XX_MDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT |
> -			PLL46XX_PDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT |
> -			PLL46XX_SDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT);
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(epll_div); i++) {
> -		if (epll_div[i][0] == rate) {
> -			epll_con_k |= epll_div[i][5] << 0;
> -			epll_con |= (epll_div[i][1] << 27 |
> -					epll_div[i][2] <<
> PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT |
> -					epll_div[i][3] <<
> PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT |
> -					epll_div[i][4] <<
> PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT);
> -			break;
> -		}
> -	}
> -
> -	if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(epll_div)) {
> -		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Invalid Clock EPLL Frequency\n",
> -				__func__);
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> -
> -	__raw_writel(epll_con, S5P_EPLL_CON);
> -	__raw_writel(epll_con_k, S5P_EPLL_CON1);
> -
> -	printk(KERN_WARNING "EPLL Rate changes from %lu to %lu\n",
> -			clk->rate, rate);
> -
> -	clk->rate = rate;
> -
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static struct clk_ops s5pv210_epll_ops = {
> -	.set_rate = s5pv210_epll_set_rate,
> -	.get_rate = s5p_epll_get_rate,
> -};
> -
>  void __init_or_cpufreq s5pv210_setup_clocks(void)
>  {
>  	struct clk *xtal_clk;
> @@ -1075,7 +999,7 @@ void __init_or_cpufreq s5pv210_setup_clocks(void)
> 
>  	/* Set functions for clk_fout_epll */
>  	clk_fout_epll.enable = s5p_epll_enable;
> -	clk_fout_epll.ops = &s5pv210_epll_ops;
> +	clk_fout_epll.ops = &pll46xx_epll_ops;
> 
>  	printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: registering clocks\n", __func__);
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c
> index 02af235..2a4678d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>  #include <mach/regs-clock.h>
> 
>  #include <plat/clock.h>
> +#include <plat/pll.h>
>  #include <plat/clock-clksrc.h>
>  #include <plat/s5p-clock.h>
> 
> @@ -203,6 +204,82 @@ struct clk_ops s5p_sclk_spdif_ops = {
>  	.get_rate	= s5p_spdif_get_rate,
>  };
> 
> +static u32 epll_div[][6] = {
> +	{  48000000, 0, 48, 3, 3, 0 },
> +	{  96000000, 0, 48, 3, 2, 0 },
> +	{ 144000000, 1, 72, 3, 2, 0 },
> +	{ 192000000, 0, 48, 3, 1, 0 },
> +	{ 288000000, 1, 72, 3, 1, 0 },
> +	{  32750000, 1, 65, 3, 4, 35127 },
> +	{  32768000, 1, 65, 3, 4, 35127 },
> +	{  45158400, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 },
> +	{  45000000, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 },
> +	{  45158000, 0, 45, 3, 3, 10355 },
> +	{  49125000, 0, 49, 3, 3, 9961 },
> +	{  49152000, 0, 49, 3, 3, 9961 },
> +	{  67737600, 1, 67, 3, 3, 48366 },
> +	{  67738000, 1, 67, 3, 3, 48366 },
> +	{  73800000, 1, 73, 3, 3, 47710 },
> +	{  73728000, 1, 73, 3, 3, 47710 },
> +	{  36000000, 1, 32, 3, 4, 0 },
> +	{  60000000, 1, 60, 3, 3, 0 },
> +	{  72000000, 1, 72, 3, 3, 0 },
> +	{  80000000, 1, 80, 3, 3, 0 },
> +	{  84000000, 0, 42, 3, 2, 0 },
> +	{  50000000, 0, 50, 3, 3, 0 },
> +};

Hmm, ok for now. But as Seungwhan Youn said, you have to know it can be
changed according to input clock for EPLL when you add this into common
plat-s5p.

> +
> +int pll46xx_epll_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)

How about to move this in plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h like other pll helper
functions?

> +{
> +	unsigned int epll_con, epll_con_k;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	/* Return if nothing changed */
> +	if (clk->rate == rate)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	epll_con = __raw_readl(S5P_EPLL_CON);
> +	epll_con_k = __raw_readl(S5P_EPLL_CON1);
> +
> +	epll_con_k &= ~PLL46XX_KDIV_MASK;
> +	epll_con &= ~(1 << 27 |
> +			PLL46XX_MDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT |
> +			PLL46XX_PDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT |
> +			PLL46XX_SDIV_MASK << PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(epll_div); i++) {
> +		if (epll_div[i][0] == rate) {
> +			epll_con_k |= epll_div[i][5] << 0;
> +			epll_con |= (epll_div[i][1] << 27 |
> +					epll_div[i][2] <<
> PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT |
> +					epll_div[i][3] <<
> PLL46XX_PDIV_SHIFT |
> +					epll_div[i][4] <<
> PLL46XX_SDIV_SHIFT);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(epll_div)) {
> +		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Invalid Clock EPLL Frequency\n",
> +				__func__);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	__raw_writel(epll_con, S5P_EPLL_CON);
> +	__raw_writel(epll_con_k, S5P_EPLL_CON1);

Basically, need to add check of pll locking after changing PLL value.

> +
> +	printk(KERN_WARNING "EPLL Rate changes from %lu to %lu\n",
> +			clk->rate, rate);
> +
> +	clk->rate = rate;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +struct clk_ops pll46xx_epll_ops = {
> +	.set_rate = pll46xx_epll_set_rate,
> +	.get_rate = s5p_epll_get_rate,

I'm not sure we need .get_rate here.
Could you please test without this?

> +};
> +
>  static struct clk *s5p_clks[] __initdata = {
>  	&clk_ext_xtal_mux,
>  	&clk_48m,
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h
b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h
> index bf28fad..911a20e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h
> @@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ static inline unsigned long s5p_get_pll46xx(unsigned
long
> baseclk,
>  	return result;
>  }
> 
> +extern int pll46xx_epll_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate);
> +extern struct clk_ops pll46xx_epll_ops;
> +
>  #define PLL90XX_MDIV_MASK	(0xFF)
>  #define PLL90XX_PDIV_MASK	(0x3F)
>  #define PLL90XX_SDIV_MASK	(0x7)
> --
> 1.7.2.3

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list