[PATCH] ARM: OMAP4: PCM049: remove vusim regulator
Tony Lindgren
tony at atomide.com
Fri Jul 15 06:59:20 EDT 2011
* Felipe Balbi <balbi at ti.com> [110715 01:25]:
>
> possibly something like this (still missing MACHINE_START a few more
> things):
Yes and it would be better to initialize data in the .init_machine
to avoid adding machine_is tests in multiple places.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c
> index 0cfe200..dff174c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c
> @@ -681,20 +681,44 @@ void omap4_panda_display_init(void)
> omap_display_init(&omap4_panda_dss_data);
> }
>
> +static struct omap_smsc911x_platform_data board_smsc911x_data __initdata = {
> + .cs = OMAP4_SMSC911X_ETH_CS,
> + .gpio_irq = OMAP4_SMSC911X_ETH_GPIO_IRQ,
> + .gpio_reset = -EINVAL,
> + .flags = SMSC911X_USE_16BIT,
> +};
> +
> +static void __init omap4_panda_smsc91xx_init(void)
> +{
> + if (!machine_is_pcm049())
> + return;
> +
> + omap_mux_init_gpio(OMAP4_PCM049_ETH_GPIO_IRQ, OMAP_PIN_INPUT);
> + gpmc_smsc911x_init(&board_smsc911x_data);
> +}
> +
> static void __init omap4_panda_init(void)
> {
> int package = OMAP_PACKAGE_CBS;
>
> if (omap_rev() == OMAP4430_REV_ES1_0)
> package = OMAP_PACKAGE_CBL;
> +
> omap4_mux_init(board_mux, NULL, package);
>
> - if (wl12xx_set_platform_data(&omap_panda_wlan_data))
> - pr_err("error setting wl12xx data\n");
> + if (machine_is_omap4panda()) {
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = wl12xx_set_platform_data(&omap_panda_wlan_data);
> + if (ret)
> + pr_err("error setting wl12xx data\n");
> +
> + platform_device_register(&omap_vwlan_device);
> + }
>
> + omap4_panda_smsc91xx_init();
> omap4_panda_i2c_init();
> platform_add_devices(panda_devices, ARRAY_SIZE(panda_devices));
> - platform_device_register(&omap_vwlan_device);
> board_serial_init();
> omap4_twl6030_hsmmc_init(mmc);
So we sould have panda_common_init() and then omap4_panda_init()
and omap4_phycore_init() or something like that. No need for machine_is
tests then as the .machine_init already takes care of that test.
Regards,
Tony
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list