[PATCH 07/15] pxa25x_udc: drop support for udc_command

[Eric Miao]

On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
<dbaryshkov at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/9/11, Greg KH <gregkh at suse.de> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 12:54:43AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 02:34:28PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>>> > On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:46:16PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> > > Hi,
>>> > >
>>> > > On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 05:08:33PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > > > None of pxa25x devices use udc_command() for UDC functionality.
>>> > > > Stop calling this callback from pxa25x_udc code.
>>> > >
>>> > > looks good to me, Greg since this is a big re-work which depends on
>>> > > parts out of the Gadget Framework, can you take all the patches
>>> > > straight ? Here's my Acked-by:
>>> > >
>>> > > Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi at ti.com>
>>> >
>>> > I can't take these, they should go through the gpio subsystem maintainer
>>> > instead.
>>>
>>> But why ? They only touch drivers/usb/gadget/pxa*.c
>>
>> All 15 patches?  No they don't they touch all sorts of things.
>>
>>> Would it be enough if Grant would Ack them ?
>>
>> Sure, but it would be easier if Grant took them all, right?
>
> Colleagues, can you please tell me the current status/future of this patches?
> Are they going to 3.1? 3.2? Should they go via ARM/PXA, via usb? usb-gadget?
> Via gpio(why?)?? Should I send them to somebody for merging?

Well, I agree with Dmitry the whole patchset is not related to the GPIO
subsystem at all. The major cleanup is actually to the PXA machines,
and touches part of the pxa25x_udc driver. If some one Acks the USB
part, I can help take the remaining patches.