[RFC PATCH] ARM ASoC: add sound driver for imx27pdk using mc13783 codec
J.Lambrecht at TELEVIC.com
Mon Jul 11 06:30:52 EDT 2011
On 07/09/2011 04:25 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 03:24:51PM +0200, J??rgen Lambrecht wrote:
> Please read and try to follow the guidelines in SubmittingPatches:
OK, I only had a quick scan through it, ... and instead of complaining
of ./Documentation being always outdated, I better supply a patch for
> - Provide a sensible changelog for your patch
i will for the patch indeed
> - Send copies to the relevant maintainers
Only being an RFC and not a real patch, I didn't do the effort of
checking MAINTAINERS, sorry.
So you and Liam Girdwood for sound/soc
> - Word wrap within 80 columns
> - Follow the kernel coding style.
Oops, I thought I already sent the patches through ./scripts/checkpatch.pl
(the patches come from another branch in my git on an older version of
(5 errors, shame on me..)
> > if SND_IMX_SOC
> > -config SND_MXC_SOC_SSI
> > - tristate
> > -
> This appeears to be unrelated to adding new machine support and should
> be a separate patch.
indeed, is someone else's patch I applied already
(when moving my branch to the latest pengutronix/for-next branch, i
thought that patch would already have been applied - forgot to check)
> > +config SND_SOC_IMX_MC13783
> > + tristate
> > +
> Err... what is this for?
Well, normally all drivers here are platform specific, but I saw my
driver for the imx27pdk was the same as the 'Phytec phyCORE (and
phyCARD) boards' one (and now I hear also valid for mx31moboard
platforms). So I decided to copy "phycore-mc13783.c" to "imx-mc13783.c",
and this 'SND_SOC_IMX_MC13783' is to compile in the Makefile.
So I added an extra layer in Kconfig, because my 'SND_SOC_IMX27_MC13783'
selects it, and also the phycore one selects it (but omitted it from my
patch because it is not mine, and only exists in the imx-sound branch of
I think now it is better to remove those 3 lines.
See next paragraph to continue.
> > config SND_MXC_SOC_WM1133_EV1
> > tristate "Audio on the the i.MX31ADS with WM1133-EV1 fitted"
> > depends on MACH_MX31ADS_WM1133_EV1 && EXPERIMENTAL
> > select SND_SOC_WM8350
> > - select SND_MXC_SOC_SSI
> > select SND_MXC_SOC_FIQ
> > help
> Again, this and all the other similar hunks are totally unrelated to
> adding a machine.
> > +config SND_SOC_IMX27_MC13783
> > + tristate "SoC Audio support for i.MX27 platforms with a
> MC13783 codec"
> > + depends on MACH_MX27_3DS
> The dependency and the text disagree with each other...
Indeed. But i did not dare to touch the phycore code (only in imx-sound
branch).. Maybe this is better (removing those 3 lines above):
tristate "SoC Audio support for i.MX27 platforms with a MC13783 codec"
depends on MACH_MX27_3DS || MACH_PCM038 || MACH_PCM037 ||
Say Y if you want to add support for SoC audio on i.MX27 platforms
with a MC13783 codec (based on Freescale's imx27pdk kit)
But actually, I have my doubts. Is it possible to reuse such a platform
I don't know the other platforms, maybe they differ a little bit?
For example our own HW (based on imx27pdk) uses an enable pin (gpio) for
the loudspeaker amplifier. Now I put it on in the machine driver (i mean
the one in ./arch/arm/mach-imx/). But to save power, it could be
interesting to enable the ampli only when needed.
What to do then: copy the complete driver and add an ampli-on/off function?
Thanks for your comments,
[snip: for next mail]
Tel: +32 (0)51 303045 Fax: +32 (0)51 310670
Televic Rail NV - Leo Bekaertlaan 1 - 8870 Izegem - Belgium
Company number 0825.539.581 - RPR Kortrijk
More information about the linux-arm-kernel