[PATCH 07/52] ARM: mach-ep93xx: convert boot_params to atag_offset

[H Hartley Sweeten]

On Thursday, July 07, 2011 10:00 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>> On Tuesday, July 05, 2011 7:47 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre at linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/adssphere.c   |    2 +-
>>>  arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/edb93xx.c     |   16 ++++++++--------
>>>  arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/gesbc9312.c   |    2 +-
>>>  arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/micro9.c      |    8 ++++----
>>>  arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/simone.c      |    2 +-
>>>  arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/snappercl15.c |    2 +-
>>>  arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/ts72xx.c      |    2 +-
>>>  7 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>> 
>> For ep93xx, this appears to be dependant on your patch:
>> 
>> [PATCH 10/37] ARM: mach-ep93xx: remove mach/memory.h and Kconfig selection of SDRAM bank
>
> Actually this should be the other way around: this is a prerequisite for 
> the removal patch, but this should only depend on the first patch (1/52) 
> of the series.
>
>> Please make sure that the merge order of these patches does not
>> break anything...
>
> Obviously.  I'm carrying them linearly in the same branch because of the 
> ordering dependencies.

Sounds good.

>> Other than that, for the ep93xx part.
>> 
>> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten at visionengravers.com>
>
> Is this valid for both patches?

No. This patch only.

For patch 01/52 of this series, please fix the checkpatch.pl issue pointed
out by Sergei Shtylyov and the build warning I pointed out.

Once I see and test that updated patch I'll probably give you a Tested-by.

Thanks,
Hartley