[PATCH v4 0/3] ARM: CSR: Adding CSR SiRFprimaII platform
Arnd Bergmann
arnd at arndb.de
Thu Jul 7 07:11:29 EDT 2011
On Thursday 07 July 2011, Barry Song wrote:
> Changelogs:
> -v4:
> v3 got "Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>"
> stopping the 0xffffffff madness for IO_SPACE_LIMIT
> fix .map_io compiling issue in the 1st patch
> fix set_next_event in timer.c
> rename GPU, USB, multimedia and SATA nodes in DTS
> delete redundant 0x in DTS
Note that when you get a 'Reviewed-by', 'Acked-by' or 'Tested-by'
reply to one of your mails, you should add that in the patch
changelog below your own 'Signed-off-by' in order to document
it for the future. This ususally still holds true when you make
further changes, just not when rewriting major parts of the patch.
For the Signed-off-by list, that should normally include only the
people that have handled the specific patch, it doesn't imply
authorship. Having seven people listed as Signed-off-by seems a bit
strange in this context, but there is no clear rule against it.
I would probably use 'Acked-by' or plain 'Cc' in the changelog for
some of the people, depending in what way they were involved.
At the least, you should have 'Signed-off-by' the person that wrote
most of the code, followed by the person that sends the patch at
the bottom of the list (as you did correctly).
Arnd
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list