[PATCH] arm: fix regression in ixp4xx clocksource

Thomas Gleixner tglx at linutronix.de
Mon Jul 4 05:21:12 EDT 2011


On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > I'm really not happy about using the MMIO clocksource stuff with random
> > other read functions like this - it defeats the entire purpose of the
> > MMIO clocksource stuff.  Maybe we should just undo the change for IXP4xx
> > and treat it as "special" for the time being.
> > 
> > Thomas - do you have any other views?
> 
> I have no objections to have special cased read functions as long as
> all the other copied code is gone. We have the same problem with the
> generic irq chip and I did not come up with a good decision function
> where to draw the line. As for everything we come up with in the
> consolidation space we need to apply common sense and keep an eye on
> the real abusers.
> 
> Though in the mmio clocksource case we might ask the question whether
> read[l|w]() is really necessary in the generic implemetation or
> not. [too tired to answer that now ]

Thinking more about it we should add BE accessor functions to the mmio
clocksource as this might be useful for other architectures as well.

Thanks,

	tglx



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list