[PATCH] ARM: mm: enforce pageblock alignment when freeing memmap entries at init
Dima Zavin
dima at android.com
Wed Jan 26 16:57:53 EST 2011
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Mel Gorman <mel at csn.ul.ie> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 03:47:11PM -0800, Dima Zavin wrote:
>> On some machines, the nodes do not always start on pageblock
>> boundaries. In these cases it is possible for free_unused_memmap
>> to free mappings for pages inside a pageblock with otherwise
>> valid pages. This presents problems for page migration since it
>> operates on whole pageblocks at a time.
>>
>
> This patch is not aligning on a pageblock boundary - it's aligning on
> MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES which is the boundary the buddy allocator works on.
> This is a minor but important nit as different assumptions are made
> about pageblocks and MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES. Anyway;
Thank you for the nit. I'm kind of a VM noob so any insight is
appreciated. I naively equated the two in my head when writing the
description.
> If the node is not starting on the MAX_ORDER boundary then node_start_pfn
> should also not be on the same boundary but the patch does not imply
> that this has been broken. If anything it appears at a glance that there
> is memmap *not* being freed because it was allocated on the
> MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES boundary and only partially freed.
>
> The comment then is confusing because the function is freeing memmap but
> rounding down to free more of it ensures that all pages get a mapping?
> It's not clear at all to me what was broken or how this patch fixes it
> but bear in mind that it's rare I look at how ARM is initialised.
The function frees the mappings *between* the nodes. So when the patch
rounds down the start of the node, it preserves (i.e. frees less) the
mappings from MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES boundary to the actual first valid
page. Otherwise, I would have to define CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE and pay
the penalty. Looking through the history, a similar patch was already
taken to roundup the previous bank end to MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES. I'm
doing the same to the start.
Am I totally off base?
--Dima
>
>> Round down bank_start to pageblock boundary so that whole
>> pageblocks always have valid mappings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dima Zavin <dima at android.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mm/init.c | 6 +++++-
>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/init.c b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
>> index 5164069..98de5d8 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mm/init.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
>> @@ -418,7 +418,11 @@ static void __init free_unused_memmap(struct meminfo *mi)
>> for_each_bank(i, mi) {
>> struct membank *bank = &mi->bank[i];
>>
>> - bank_start = bank_pfn_start(bank);
>> + /* Round bank_start down to the start of a pageblock so that
>> + * all pages in a pageblock always have a mapping.
>> + */
>> + bank_start = round_down(bank_pfn_start(bank),
>> + MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES);
>>
>> /*
>> * If we had a previous bank, and there is a space
>> --
>> 1.7.3.1
>>
>
> --
> Mel Gorman
> Linux Technology Center
> IBM Dublin Software Lab
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list