[PATCH] ARM: mxs: irq_data conversion
Russell King - ARM Linux
linux at arm.linux.org.uk
Fri Jan 21 05:27:07 EST 2011
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:15:36AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> IMHO doing it the other way round would be better. (i.e. use a def_bool
> y for the unconverted platforms and then push that down.) But maybe
> this is just a matter of taste.
>
> How should we proceed? Lennert, do you take my patch? Should I resend
> without the select? IIRC there were send a few other patches (for tegra
> maybe?). Don't know if you missed these, too?
It looks like it's relatively few platforms which were missed:
arch/arm/mach-msm/gpio-v2.c- .mask = msm_gpio_irq_mask,
arch/arm/mach-msm/gpio-v2.c- .unmask = msm_gpio_irq_unmask,
arch/arm/mach-msm/gpio-v2.c- .ack = msm_gpio_irq_ack,
arch/arm/mach-lh7a40x/irq-kev7a400.c- .ack = lh7a400_ack_cpld_irq,
arch/arm/mach-lh7a40x/irq-kev7a400.c- .mask = lh7a400_mask_cpld_irq,
arch/arm/mach-lh7a40x/irq-kev7a400.c- .unmask = lh7a400_unmask_cpld_irq,
arch/arm/mach-vt8500/irq.c- .ack = vt8500_irq_mask,
arch/arm/mach-vt8500/irq.c- .mask = vt8500_irq_mask,
arch/arm/mach-vt8500/irq.c- .unmask = vt8500_irq_unmask,
arch/arm/mach-mxs/gpio.c- .ack = mxs_gpio_ack_irq,
arch/arm/mach-mxs/gpio.c- .mask = mxs_gpio_mask_irq,
arch/arm/mach-mxs/gpio.c- .unmask = mxs_gpio_unmask_irq,
arch/arm/mach-mxs/icoll.c- .ack = icoll_ack_irq,
arch/arm/mach-mxs/icoll.c- .mask = icoll_mask_irq,
arch/arm/mach-mxs/icoll.c- .unmask = icoll_unmask_irq,
vt8500 is new in my tree, so needs to be updated. The other stuff I
guessed Lennert missed for one reason or another, so... patches welcome.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list