[PATCH v2] ARM: Change misleading warning when CONFIG_CMDLINE_FORCE is used
u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de
Wed Jan 12 04:32:46 EST 2011
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 09:17:16AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > Does it make sense at all to disable CONFIG_CMDLINE_FORCE? If not, I
> > suggest to remove it.
> Eeh? Do you understand what CONFIG_CMDLINE_FORCE is and what effect it
> When CONFIG_CMDLINE_FORCE is enabled, we ignore the command line passed
> in from the boot loader and always use the built-in command line. When
> CONFIG_CMDLINE_FORCE is disabled, we will use the boot loader supplied
> command line if present.
> "Does it make sense at all to disable CONFIG_CMDLINE_FORCE" so, if you
> always have it enabled, you can never pass in a command line from a boot
> loader. That's an absolutely idiotic idea.
> _Most_ of us want to pass in command lines from the boot loader so we can
> configure things.
ah, I thought the effect of CONFIG_CMDLINE_FORCE would be its inverse.
And ok, this is probably about broken boot loaders that I'm just not
> Please, if you don't understand, ask questions rather than making
> completely misleading review comments which may confuse patch submitters.
IMHO "Does it make sense at all to disable CONFIG_CMDLINE_FORCE?" is a
question, isn't it?
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
More information about the linux-arm-kernel