[PATCH 2/4] msm: iommu: Rework clock logic and add IOMMU bus clock control
Stepan Moskovchenko
stepanm at codeaurora.org
Fri Feb 25 17:09:57 EST 2011
On 2/24/2011 11:29 PM, Trilok Soni wrote:
> Hi Steve,
Hello
>> @@ -130,117 +131,134 @@ static int msm_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> struct resource *r, *r2;
>> struct clk *iommu_clk;
>> + struct clk *iommu_pclk;
>> struct msm_iommu_drvdata *drvdata;
>> struct msm_iommu_dev *iommu_dev = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> const please.
>
I am not clear on what you mean. Please be more specific here.
>> + iommu_pclk = clk_get(NULL, "smmu_pclk");
>> + if (IS_ERR(iommu_pclk)) {
>> + ret = -ENODEV;
>> + goto fail;
>> + }
> I am not a big fan of this when you have the "device" around. You should just do
>
> iommu_pclk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>
> ...error logic...
>
> iommu_clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "iommu_clk");
>
> ...error logic...
>
The pclk is a "special" bus clock and does not have a specific device
instance associated with it, so passing a device would not be
appropriate in this case. I pass the device for other clocks that are
indeed associated with devices, but this is not one of them. I suppose
we could create 11 or 12 aliases for the pclk and associate it with all
the IOMMU devices, but I would prefer to avoid doing that as I believe
the current approach is cleaner.
>> - ret = -EBUSY;
>> - goto fail;
>> - }
>> + len = r->end - r->start + 1;
>
> resource_size please.
>
Ok
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list