[PATCH v2 0/5] ARM: omap[34]: Thumb-2 compatibility fixes

[Dave Martin]

On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
<santosh.shilimkar at ti.com> wrote:
> Dave,
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dave Martin [mailto:dave.martin at linaro.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 11:33 PM
>> To: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> Cc: Dave Martin; Tony Lindgren; Santosh Shilimkar; Jean Pihet;
>> linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; Nicolas Pitre
>> Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] ARM: omap[34]: Thumb-2 compatibility fixes
>>
>> This set of patches, along with some other patches under
>> discussion on alkml, should enable omap3 and omap4 kernels to be
>> built with CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL.
>>
>> This patch set builds on recent cleanup done by the omap
>> maintainers.
>>
>> It is also more aggressive than my last post: all affected
>> low-level code is now built in Thumb-2.  At least some of this
>> code definitely works, but whether the Secure firmware can talk
>> to Thumb-2 code properly is unproven:
>> in particular, I could use some help/advice from the omap
>> community for validating that the low-level power management
>> interactions actually work with this patch set.
>>
>> I've done simple "does it boot?" testing by building a single
>> kernel with CONFIG_SMP_ON_UP and CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL enabled
>> which works on Beagle xM A2 and Panda A1.
>
> I have boot tested this series on OMAP3430 and OMAP4430. Also
> tested the RETENTION and OFF mode in suspend on OMAP3.

Which tree did you use to test this?  It didn't seem to work for me --
sometimes the system wouldn't suspend, complaining about USB suspend
errors; and other times I couldn't bring it out of suspend (by poking
a USB input device).

I might be doing something wrong...

> I couldn't test the DVFS because it isn't in mainline yet
> but the changes doesn't looks to break anything.
>
> So if you like, you can add
> Tested-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com>
> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com>
>

Thanks, that's great.

If there some other tree with DVFS working which I could try?  Even if
these patches don't apply, I may be able to test whether the changes
should work.

Cheers
---Dave