[patch 3/5] efikamx: add mc13892 support / implement power off
Arnaud Patard (Rtp)
arnaud.patard at rtp-net.org
Wed Feb 2 11:04:08 EST 2011
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de> writes:
> Hi Arnaud,
>
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 12:21:07PM +0100, Arnaud Patard wrote:
>> This patch declares regulators for the efikamx. Use it also to power off the
>> efikamx.
>> Unfortunately, on the efikamx to2 boards, this doesn't work but they allow to
>> power off by setting GPIO 4 13 to high level instead of powering off through
>> the mc13892.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Patard <arnaud.patard at rtp-net.org>
>>
>
> [...]
>
>> Index: linux-2.6-submit/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx51_efikamx.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6-submit.orig/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx51_efikamx.c 2011-02-02 09:57:51.000000000 +0100
>> +++ linux-2.6-submit/arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-mx51_efikamx.c 2011-02-02 09:59:43.000000000 +0100
>> @@ -25,6 +25,9 @@
>> #include <linux/fsl_devices.h>
>> #include <linux/spi/flash.h>
>> #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
>> +#include <linux/mfd/mc13892.h>
>> +#include <linux/regulator/machine.h>
>> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>>
>> #include <mach/common.h>
>> #include <mach/hardware.h>
>> @@ -56,6 +59,10 @@
>> #define EFIKAMX_RESET1_1 IMX_GPIO_NR(3, 2)
>> #define EFIKAMX_RESET IMX_GPIO_NR(1, 4)
>>
>> +#define EFIKAMX_POWEROFF IMX_GPIO_NR(4, 13)
>> +
>> +#define EFIKAMX_PMIC IMX_GPIO_NR(1, 6)
>> +
>> /* the pci ids pin have pull up. they're driven low according to board id */
>> #define MX51_PAD_PCBID0 IOMUX_PAD(0x518, 0x130, 3, 0x0, 0, PAD_CTL_PUS_100K_UP)
>> #define MX51_PAD_PCBID1 IOMUX_PAD(0x51C, 0x134, 3, 0x0, 0, PAD_CTL_PUS_100K_UP)
>> @@ -79,6 +86,9 @@
>> /* reset */
>> MX51_PAD_DI1_PIN13__GPIO3_2,
>> MX51_PAD_GPIO1_4__GPIO1_4,
>> +
>> + /* power off */
>> + MX51_PAD_CSI2_VSYNC__GPIO4_13,
>> };
>>
>> /* PCBID2 PCBID1 PCBID0 STATE
>> @@ -187,6 +197,44 @@
>> gpio_direction_output(EFIKAMX_RESET, 0);
>> }
>>
>> +static struct regulator *pwgt1, *pwgt2, *coincell;
>> +
>> +static void mx51_efikamx_power_off(void)
>> +{
>> + if (!IS_ERR(coincell))
>> + regulator_disable(coincell);
>> +
>> + if (!IS_ERR(pwgt1) && !IS_ERR(pwgt2)) {
>> + regulator_disable(pwgt2);
>> + regulator_disable(pwgt1);
>> + }
>> + gpio_direction_output(EFIKAMX_POWEROFF, 1);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __init mx51_efikamx_power_init(void)
>> +{
>> + pwgt1 = regulator_get(NULL, "pwgt1");
>> + pwgt2 = regulator_get(NULL, "pwgt2");
>> + if (!IS_ERR(pwgt1) && !IS_ERR(pwgt2)) {
>> + regulator_enable(pwgt1);
>> + regulator_enable(pwgt2);
>> + }
>> + gpio_request(EFIKAMX_POWEROFF, "poweroff");
>> + pm_power_off = mx51_efikamx_power_off;
>> +
>> + /* enable coincell charger. maybe need a small power driver ? */
>> + coincell = regulator_get(NULL, "coincell");
>> + if (!IS_ERR(coincell)) {
>> + regulator_set_voltage(coincell, 3000000, 3000000);
>> + regulator_enable(coincell);
>> + }
>> +
>> + regulator_has_full_constraints();
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +late_initcall(mx51_efikamx_power_init);
>
> Please always protect these board specific initcalls with a
> machine_is_*. Just because efikamx support is compiled into the kernel
> doesn't mean it's the only machine this kernel will run on.
ok. fixed here and in sb code. I'm using the same kernel on sb & mx but
the diff are small in this part so I didn't notice. I'm going to test if
things are still ok with the proper checks.
Arnaud
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list