[PATCH v1 1/4] davinci: da8xx/omap-l1: add support for SPI

[Sergei Shtylyov]

Hello.

On 02-02-2011 15:55, Michael Williamson wrote:

>>> Add SPI registration routines, clocks, and driver resources for
>>> DA850/OMAP-L138/AM18x and DA830/OMAP-L137/AM17x platforms.

>>     You're only adding clocks for the former platform -- the ones for the latter platfrom are already there...

>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Williamson<michael.williamson at criticallink.com>
>> [...]

>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c
>>> index beda8a4..f421f97 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c
>>> @@ -725,3 +725,99 @@ int __init da8xx_register_cpuidle(void)
>>>
>>>        return platform_device_register(&da8xx_cpuidle_device);
>>>    }
>>> +
>>> +static struct resource da8xx_spi0_resources[] = {
>>> +    [0] = {
>>> +        .start    = 0x01c41000,
>>> +        .end    = 0x01c41fff,
>>> +        .flags    = IORESOURCE_MEM,
>>> +    },
>>> +    [1] = {
>>> +        .start    = IRQ_DA8XX_SPINT0,
>>> +        .end    = IRQ_DA8XX_SPINT0,
>>> +        .flags    = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
>>> +    },
>>> +    [2] = {
>>> +        .start    = EDMA_CTLR_CHAN(0, 14),
>>> +        .end    = EDMA_CTLR_CHAN(0, 14),
>>> +        .flags    = IORESOURCE_DMA,
>>> +    },
>>> +    [3] = {
>>> +        .start    = EDMA_CTLR_CHAN(0, 15),
>>> +        .end    = EDMA_CTLR_CHAN(0, 15),
>>> +        .flags    = IORESOURCE_DMA,
>>> +    },

>>     We have DA830_DMACH_SPI0_[RT]X defined for SPI0 DMA channels...

> Right.  The current routines/structures were designed to support either da830 or
> da850.  They work because the interrupts and the DMA channels are fortunately
> the same for the SPI devices between the platforms.  I can use the DA830 enums,
> but I had preferred the clarity of the EDMA_CTRL_CHAN macro, and it would
> remove confusion that this might only apply for DA830 and not DA850.  It would
> be nice to rename that DA8XX_DMAC_SPI_[RT]X if the enums were used...

> Can I leave this, or do you really want me to use the enums?

    OK, you can leave this as is...

>>> +    [4] = {
>>> +        .flags    = IORESOURCE_DMA,
>>> +    },

>>     BTW, why do you need this placeholder?

> This is for the eventq selection in the edma allocation by the spi driver.  When I
> previously had 0, I should have used EVENTQ_0 (how it was tested).  I will add it
> back in to clarification.

    But event queue is not a DMA channel, so can't have just IORESOURCE_DMA in 
'flags'. IIUC, there was a patch to add some clarifying flag(s) to 
IORESOURCE_DMA to support the event queue resource (which I never approved :-).

WBR, Sergei