Locking in the clk API, part 2: clk_prepare/clk_unprepare
Russell King - ARM Linux
linux at arm.linux.org.uk
Tue Feb 1 10:24:58 EST 2011
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 04:18:46PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> yeah, didn't thought about multiple consumers, so (as Jeremy suggested)
> the right thing is to sleep until CLK_BUSY is cleared.
A simpler way to write this is:
int clk_prepare(struct clk *clk)
{
int ret = 0;
mutex_lock(&clk->mutex);
if (clk->prepared == 0)
ret = clk->ops->prepare(clk);
if (ret == 0)
clk->prepared++;
mutex_unlock(&clk->mutex);
return ret;
}
I think we want to take a common mutex not only for clk_prepare(), but
also for clk_set_rate(). If prepare() is waiting for a PLL to lock,
we don't want a set_rate() interfering with that.
I'd also be tempted at this stage to build-in a no-op dummy clock,
that being the NULL clk:
int clk_prepare(struct clk *clk)
{
int ret = 0;
if (clk) {
mutex_lock(&clk->mutex);
if (clk->prepared == 0)
ret = clk->ops->prepare(clk);
if (ret == 0)
clk->prepared++;
mutex_unlock(&clk->mutex);
}
return ret;
}
as we have various platforms defining a dummy struct clk as a way of
satisfying various driver requirements. These dummy clocks are exactly
that - they're complete no-ops.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list