[PATCH v7 5/8] davinci: dm644x: change vpfe capture structure variables for consistency
Karicheri, Muralidharan
m-karicheri2 at ti.com
Wed Dec 21 09:55:23 EST 2011
original Message-----
>> From: davinci-linux-open-source-bounces+m-
>> karicheri2=ti.com at linux.davincidsp.com [mailto:davinci-linux-open-source-
>> bounces+m-karicheri2=ti.com at linux.davincidsp.com] On Behalf Of Hadli,
>> Manjunath
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 8:44 AM
>> To: dlos; LAK
>> Subject: [PATCH v7 5/8] davinci: dm644x: change vpfe capture structure
>> variables for consistency
>>
>> Add SoC and board prefixes to variable names so that it is
>> consistent with the rest of the file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Manjunath Hadli <manjunath.hadli at ti.com>
>> Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar at ti.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
>> arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm644x.c | 12 ++++++------
>> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-
>> davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c
>> index 6d76d7c..7d940f5 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c
>> @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static struct platform_device davinci_fb_device = {
>> .num_resources = 0,
>> };
>>
>> -static struct tvp514x_platform_data tvp5146_pdata = {
>> +static struct tvp514x_platform_data dm644xevm_tvp5146_pdata = {
>> .clk_polarity = 0,
>> .hs_polarity = 1,
>> .vs_polarity = 1
>> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static struct tvp514x_platform_data tvp5146_pdata = {
>>
>> #define TVP514X_STD_ALL (V4L2_STD_NTSC | V4L2_STD_PAL)
>> /* Inputs available at the TVP5146 */
>> -static struct v4l2_input tvp5146_inputs[] = {
>> +static struct v4l2_input dm644xevm_tvp5146_inputs[] = {
>> {
>> .index = 0,
>> .name = "Composite",
>> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static struct v4l2_input tvp5146_inputs[] = {
>> * ouput that goes to vpfe. There is a one to one correspondence
>> * with tvp5146_inputs
>> */
>> -static struct vpfe_route tvp5146_routes[] = {
>> +static struct vpfe_route dm644xevm_tvp5146_routes[] = {
>> {
>> .input = INPUT_CVBS_VI2B,
>> .output = OUTPUT_10BIT_422_EMBEDDED_SYNC,
>> @@ -229,13 +229,13 @@ static struct vpfe_route tvp5146_routes[] = {
>> },
>> };
>>
>> -static struct vpfe_subdev_info vpfe_sub_devs[] = {
>> +static struct vpfe_subdev_info dm644xevm_vpfe_sub_devs[] = {
>> {
>> .name = "tvp5146",
>> .grp_id = 0,
>> - .num_inputs = ARRAY_SIZE(tvp5146_inputs),
>> - .inputs = tvp5146_inputs,
>> - .routes = tvp5146_routes,
>> + .num_inputs = ARRAY_SIZE(dm644xevm_tvp5146_inputs),
>> + .inputs = dm644xevm_tvp5146_inputs,
>> + .routes = dm644xevm_tvp5146_routes,
>> .can_route = 1,
>> .ccdc_if_params = {
>> .if_type = VPFE_BT656,
>> @@ -244,15 +244,15 @@ static struct vpfe_subdev_info vpfe_sub_devs[] = {
>> },
>> .board_info = {
>> I2C_BOARD_INFO("tvp5146", 0x5d),
>> - .platform_data = &tvp5146_pdata,
>> + .platform_data = &dm644xevm_tvp5146_pdata,
>> },
>> },
>> };
>>
>> -static struct vpfe_config vpfe_cfg = {
>> - .num_subdevs = ARRAY_SIZE(vpfe_sub_devs),
>> +static struct vpfe_config dm644xevm_capture_cfg = {
>> + .num_subdevs = ARRAY_SIZE(dm644xevm_vpfe_sub_devs),
>> .i2c_adapter_id = 1,
>> - .sub_devs = vpfe_sub_devs,
>> + .sub_devs = dm644xevm_vpfe_sub_devs,
>> .card_name = "DM6446 EVM",
>> .ccdc = "DM6446 CCDC",
>> };
>> @@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ static void __init
>> davinci_evm_map_io(void)
>> {
>> /* setup input configuration for VPFE input devices */
>> - dm644x_set_vpfe_config(&vpfe_cfg);
>> + dm644x_set_vpfe_config(&dm644xevm_capture_cfg);
>> dm644x_init();
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm644x.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm644x.c
>> index 97aecf2..acd9ee2 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm644x.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm644x.c
>> @@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ static struct platform_device dm644x_vpss_device = {
>> .resource = dm644x_vpss_resources,
>> };
>>
>> -static struct resource vpfe_resources[] = {
>> +static struct resource dm644x_vpfe_resources[] = {
>> {
>> .start = IRQ_VDINT0,
>> .end = IRQ_VDINT0,
>> @@ -648,11 +648,11 @@ static struct platform_device dm644x_ccdc_dev = {
>> },
>> };
>>
>> -static struct platform_device vpfe_capture_dev = {
>> +static struct platform_device dm644x_vpfe_dev = {
>> .name = CAPTURE_DRV_NAME,
>> .id = -1,
>> - .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(vpfe_resources),
>> - .resource = vpfe_resources,
>> + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(dm644x_vpfe_resources),
>> + .resource = dm644x_vpfe_resources,
>> .dev = {
>> .dma_mask = &vpfe_capture_dma_mask,
>> .coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
>> @@ -661,7 +661,7 @@ static struct platform_device vpfe_capture_dev = {
>>
>> void dm644x_set_vpfe_config(struct vpfe_config *cfg)
>> {
>> - vpfe_capture_dev.dev.platform_data = cfg;
>> + dm644x_vpfe_dev.dev.platform_data = cfg;
>> }
>>
>> /*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
>> @@ -809,7 +809,7 @@ static int __init dm644x_init_devices(void)
>>
>> platform_device_register(&dm644x_vpss_device);
>> platform_device_register(&dm644x_ccdc_dev);
>> - platform_device_register(&vpfe_capture_dev);
>> + platform_device_register(&dm644x_vpfe_dev);
>>
Just a suggestion. Why don't we change these with platform_add_devices() API call and register all of the video devices in once call instead of separate calls to platform_device_register?
>> return 0;
>> }
>> --
>> 1.6.2.4
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
>> Davinci-linux-open-source at linux.davincidsp.com
>> http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list