[PATCH 0/9] arm/tegra: Various pinmux-related cleanups
olof at lixom.net
Mon Dec 19 21:03:43 EST 2011
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 09:49:57AM -0800, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Olof Johansson wrote at Saturday, December 17, 2011 5:57 PM:
> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 03:12:23PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > > While working on switching Tegra to a new pinctrl-based pin mux driver,
> > > I made a bunch of small pinmux-related fixes; this patch series.
> > >
> > > This patch series will have a few small context conflicts with Peter
> > > De Schrijver's Tegra30 support. Peter's patch series should have
> > > priority over this one (i.e. be the one merged if it's difficult to
> > > merge both).
> > Contents of the series as a whole looks good to me, but I did notice a
> > bunch of section mismatches. Instead of commenting on the specific
> > ones, just compile with CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y and fix up the
> > new ones and repost, please. :)
> Just to close the loop on our IRC conversation, I believe those problems
> were introduced by the pinmux rework in Peter's T30 patches rather than
> my patch series. In particular, some in:
> 6996e08 arm/tegra: prepare pinmux code for multiple tegra variants
> And some in:
> 241682c arm/tegra: pinmux tables and definitions for tegra30
> Although the latter don't show up until:
> 44107d8 arm/tegra: implement support for tegra30
> Since that actually creates the Kconfig option that allows the T30 pinmux
> code to be built.
> I'll take a look and come up with a patch for this that can be applied to
> Tegra's for-3.3/soc branch.
Yep, sounds good. Applied this series to for-3.3/boards -- thanks!
More information about the linux-arm-kernel