Status of the following patch (clocksource sched_clock) ?
Russell King - ARM Linux
linux at arm.linux.org.uk
Mon Dec 19 12:25:57 EST 2011
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 05:21:58PM +0000, Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote:
> I am running into a clocksource wrap around issue due to which
> sched_clock() returned value is wrapped around at clocksource
> timeout rate. I see this issue is addressed in
Your interpretation of that patch is wrong. The patch you refer to is
consolidating what's already there.
> Could someone tell me what is the status of this patch? I want to try
> it on my target platform which is a davinci variant.
Just make sure you use the sched_clock infrastructure already provided
on ARM and provided you give it the correct information - and set it up
early enough (in init_early) you will not have any sched_clock() wraps.
This is because a timer will be set to automatically update things
before any wrap occurs.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel