[PATCH v4 REPOST 5/5] imx6q: Remove unconditional dependency on l2x0 L2 cache support

[Shawn Guo]

Hi Dave,

Sorry for that I did not look into previous post to point it out.

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:39:41AM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> The i.MX6 Quad SoC will work without the l2x0 L2 cache controller
> support built into the kernel, so this patch removes the dependency
> on CACHE_L2X0 and selects MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0 instead.
> 
> This makes the l2x0 support optional, so that it can be turned off
> when desired for debugging purposes etc.
> 
> Thanks to Shawn Guo for this suggestion. [1]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin at linaro.org>
> 
> [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2011-November/074602.html
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig
> index 29a3d61..1fb93f2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig
> @@ -609,13 +609,13 @@ comment "i.MX6 family:"
>  config SOC_IMX6Q
>  	bool "i.MX6 Quad support"
>  	select ARM_GIC
> -	select CACHE_L2X0
>  	select CPU_V7
>  	select HAVE_ARM_SCU
>  	select HAVE_IMX_GPC
>  	select HAVE_IMX_MMDC
>  	select HAVE_IMX_SRC
>  	select HAVE_SMP
> +	select MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0

The option SOC_IMX6Q is only available when ARCH_IMX_V6_V7 is selected.
Since MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0 has been selected by ARCH_IMX_V6_V7 in
patch #1, this line seems redundant here.

Regards,
Shawn

>  	select USE_OF
>  
>  	help
> -- 
> 1.7.4.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>