[PATCHv2 0/7]ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO DaisyChain support via hwmod mux
Kevin Hilman
khilman at ti.com
Tue Dec 13 14:31:27 EST 2011
Vishwanath Sripathy <vishwanath.bs at ti.com> writes:
> Kevin,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Vishwanath Sripathy [mailto:vishwanath.bs at ti.com]
>> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 10:29 PM
>> To: Kevin Hilman
>> Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> Subject: RE: [PATCHv2 0/7]ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO DaisyChain
>> support via hwmod mux
>>
>> Kevin,
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Vishwanath Sripathy [mailto:vishwanath.bs at ti.com]
>> > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 2:58 PM
>> > To: Kevin Hilman
>> > Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
>> kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> > Subject: RE: [PATCHv2 0/7]ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO DaisyChain
>> > support via hwmod mux
>> >
>> > ---
>> > > >> > Can you refresh this against Tony's 'fixes' branch and re-
>> > test.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > I tested this on OMAP3430/n900 and noticed that it no
>> longer
>> > > hit
>> > > >> off
>> > > >> > mode from idle.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > IOW, If I enable UART timeouts and then enable off mode, I
>> > > don't
>> > > >> > actually ever hit off during idle. However, if I do a
>> > > >> > suspend/resume I
>> > > >> > see it hits off mode, then subsequent attempts to hit off
>> > > during
>> > > >> > idle work.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Can you investigate this?
>> > > >> OK. Let me check that.
>> > > > I rebased these patches against latest Tony's fixes branch and
>> > > tested it
>> > > > on OMAP3430 SDP. I see that Core enters off mode in idle path
>> > > after
>> > > > setting UART timeout w/o having to suspend the system.
>> > >
>> > > OK, sounds good.
>> > >
>> > > Do you have a branch that I can test as well?
>> > Sure. It's available at
>> > git://gitorious.org/omap-pm/linux.git for_3.3/io_daisy_chain
>> Did you get any chance to test it at your side?
>> Should I post the rebased patches?
> I have rebased these patch series against LO master commit id:
> deee6d5359969a0ce4e2760cfd7b9f379bd5698a and same is available here [1].
>
> I have tested these patch series along with Tero's Chain Handler +
> Govind's UART Runtime series which is available at [2].
Thanks.
Can you repost the latest version, with tested-bys as appropriate and
describing how it was tested and on what platforms.
This series has several dependencies/conflicts with Tero's series, so it
would be helpful that the posted version is based on Tero's stuff.
Since Tero's stuff is going through Paul, your series will as well (if
Paul is OK with it.)
Kevin
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list