[PATCH 03/11] mm: mmzone: introduce zone_pfn_same_memmap()

[Michal Nazarewicz]

> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 05:43:10PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86 at mina86.com>
>> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
>> index 6afae0e..09c9702 100644
>> --- a/mm/compaction.c
>> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
>> @@ -111,7 +111,10 @@ skip:
>>
>>  next:
>>  		pfn += isolated;
>> -		page += isolated;
>> +		if (zone_pfn_same_memmap(pfn - isolated, pfn))
>> +			page += isolated;
>> +		else
>> +			page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>>  	}

On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:19:53 +0100, Mel Gorman <mel at csn.ul.ie> wrote:
> Is this necessary?
>
> We are isolating pages, the largest of which is a MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES
> page.  [...]

On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:40:30 +0100, Mel Gorman <mel at csn.ul.ie> wrote:
> To be clear, I'm referring to a single page being isolated here. It may
> or may not be a high-order page but it's still going to be less then
> MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES so you should be able check when a new block is
> entered and pfn_to_page is necessary.

Do you mean something like:

if (same pageblock)
	just do arithmetic;
else
	use pfn_to_page;

?

I've discussed it with Dave and he suggested that approach as an
optimisation since in some configurations zone_pfn_same_memmap()
is always true thus compiler will strip the else part, whereas
same pageblock test will be false on occasions regardless of kernel
configuration.

-- 
Best regards,                                         _     _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of      o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science,  Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz    (o o)
ooo +----<email/xmpp: mpn at google.com>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--