[RESEND][PATCH] ARM: Exynos: Add irq domain and device tree support for interrupt combiner
Rob Herring
robherring2 at gmail.com
Sun Dec 11 22:42:22 EST 2011
On 12/11/2011 12:48 AM, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> A common irq domain for the interrupts managed by the interrupt combiners is
> setup. All the instances of irq combiner reference the common irq domain for
> translating hardware interrupts to linux irq number.
>
> In case of device tree based boot, a interrupt specifier translator is setup
> that can translate interrupt specifiers for device nodes which use combiner
> as their interrupt parent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham at linaro.org>
> ---
> Please ignore the previous post patch since that patch has a compilation error
> when CONFIG_OF was not defined.
>
> This patch is based on the following tree.
> http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git for-next
>
> .../bindings/arm/samsung/interrupt-combiner.txt | 27 +++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpu.c | 29 ++++++---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/irq-combiner.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++---
> 3 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/interrupt-combiner.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/interrupt-combiner.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/interrupt-combiner.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6c960dc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/interrupt-combiner.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> +* Samsung Exynos Interrupt Combiner Controller
> +
> +Samsung's Exynos4 architecture includes a interrupt combiner which can combine
> +interrupt sources as a group and provide a single interrupt request for the
> +group. The interrupt request from each group are connected to a parent interrupt
> +controller, such as GIC in case of Exynos4210.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: should be "samsung,exynos4210-combiner".
> +- #interrupt-cells: should be <2>. The meaning of the cells are
> + * First Cell: Combiner Group Number.
> + * Second Cell: Interrupt number within the group.
> +- reg: Base address and size of interrupt combiner registers.
> +- interrupt-controller: Identifies the node as an interrupt controller.
> +
> +Optional properties:
> +- interrupt-parent: pHandle of the parent interrupt controller, if not
> + inherited from the parent node.
> +
> +Example:
> +
> + combiner:interrupt-controller at 10440000 {
> + compatible = "samsung,exynos4120-combiner";
> + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> + interrupt-controoler;
s/controoler/controller/
> + reg = <0x10440000 0x1000>;
> + };
[snip]
> +
> +int __init combiner_init_irq_domain(unsigned int irq_base, unsigned int nr_irq,
Make irq_base signed.
> + struct device_node *np)
> +{
> + struct irq_domain *domain = &combiner_irq_domain;
> +
> + domain->irq_base = irq_alloc_descs(irq_base, irq_base, nr_irq, 0);
This should be irq_alloc_descs(irq_base, 1,
So that dynamic allocation can work when irq_base is -1.
> + if (domain->irq_base < 0) {
> + pr_err("failed to alloc irq descs, combiner init failed\n");
> + return -EBUSY;
On failure, just warn and do:
domain->irq_base = irq_base
instead of returning unless all platforms using this are completely
converted over to support dynamic Linux virq mapping.
Also you should update your platforms' to set mdesc.nr_irq to
NR_IRQS_LEGACY. And test with SPARSE_IRQ turned on.
Rob
> + }
> + domain->nr_irq = nr_irq;
> + domain->ops = &combiner_irq_domain_ops;
> + domain->of_node = np;
> + irq_domain_add(domain);
> + return 0;
> +}
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list