[Linaro-mm-sig] [RFC v2 1/2] dma-buf: Introduce dma buffer sharing mechanism
rmorell at nvidia.com
Fri Dec 9 17:50:56 EST 2011
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 09:18:48AM -0800, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 02 December 2011, Sumit Semwal wrote:
> > This is the first step in defining a dma buffer sharing mechanism.
> > + return dmabuf;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_buf_export);
> I agree with Konrad, this should definitely be EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL,
> because it's really a low-level function that I would expect
> to get used by in-kernel subsystems providing the feature to
> users and having back-end drivers, but it's not the kind of thing
> we want out-of-tree drivers to mess with.
Is this really necessary? If this is intended to be a
lowest-common-denominator between many drivers to allow buffer sharing,
it seems like it needs to be able to be usable by all drivers.
If the interface is not accessible then I fear many drivers will be
forced to continue to roll their own buffer sharing mechanisms (which is
exactly what we're trying to avoid here, needless to say).
More information about the linux-arm-kernel