[GIT PULL] Linux support for ARM LPAE

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 10:15:24PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On 7 December 2011 20:29, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux at arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 12:25:44PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >> ARM: pgtable: Fix compiler warning in ioremap.c introduced by nopud
> >>
> >> From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
> >>
> >> With the arch/arm code conversion to pgtable-nopud.h, the section and
> >> supersection (un|re)map code triggers compiler warnings on UP systems.
> >> This is caused by pmd_offset() being given a pgd_t argument rather than
> >> a pud_t one. This patch makes the necessary conversion via pud_alloc()
> >> and pmd_alloc().
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
> >
> > So, do I now take this email as you saying that _your_ LPAE tree is
> > not ready for merging because you want to rework this patch, or what?
> 
> No, I'm not, it's you saying that your nopud patch does not have any
> fix for the warnings, even though I had fixes posted for months.

Stop it Catalin.  You're being utterly rediculous.  You asked why I
hadn't merged my patch during the last merge window.  So I told you -
just like I've been telling you by email and during our monthly calls
why I've not been merging it.  You asked the question (again) so I
told you why (again).

> The
> same fix that's in my LPAE series was sent to you to include with your
> patch but instead you kept saying (even twice in the past week) that
> those warning had no fix.

Utter rubbish.  I'll say it again.  You asked why I hadn't merged my
patch.  So I told you - just like I've been telling you by email and
during our monthly calls why I've not been merging it.  You asked the
question (again) so I told you why.

> From that, I understand that you really
> don't consider my patch a proper fix for the compiler warnings.

WTF.

> > Because you've decided to go down the path of reworking this patch,
> > I consider it dangerous for me to just pull from your tree again - I've
> > no idea what I'd get, and I've no idea whether what's there is what you
> > want me to merge.
> 
> I haven't changed anything in my LPAE branch, just posted an
> alternative fix-up for the nopud patch. Please _state_ clearly whether
> you consider my original (in the LPAE series) fixup valid or not. If
> yes, I'm happy that I don't have to rework anything.

Oh for god sake.  I think I've already stated very clearly what I want.
I see no reason to repeat myself yet again.