[RFC][PATCH] ARM: kirkwood: Remove eSATA SheevaPlug board support
nico at fluxnic.net
Tue Dec 6 14:45:30 EST 2011
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011, Tixy wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 13:00 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Sat, 3 Dec 2011, Tixy wrote:
> > > [PATCH] Fix machine_is_xxx() naming for eSata SheevaPlug and QNAP TS-209
> > >
> > > The eSata SheevaPlug and QNAP TS-209 devices were removed from
> > > mach-types due to naming mismatches between machine_is_xxx(), CONFIG_XXX
> > > and MACH_TYPE_XXX.
> > >
> > > This patch fixes those mismatches and adds the devices back into
> > > mach-types.
> > >
> > > Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico at fluxnic.net>
> > > Cc: Lennert Buytenhek <kernel at wantstofly.org>
> > > Cc: Russell King <linux at arm.linux.org.uk>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy at yxit.co.uk>
> > Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico at linaro.org>
> > Obviously, the change to mach-types should be done in the machine
> > registry database as well by RMK.
> Which tree should this go through? Russell's or arm-soc?
The arm-soc tree is probably more appropriate. Don't include the
mach-types changes though as it is preferable if they come through RMK's
More information about the linux-arm-kernel