[PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
nicolas.pitre at linaro.org
Tue Dec 6 14:11:42 EST 2011
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 02:49:01PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > No need to convert everything.
> > First move is to make irq=0 meaning no IRQ. That means making things
> > like:
> > if (irq < 0)
> > if (irq >= 0)
> > into
> > if (irq <= 0)
> > if (irq > 0)
> > And replace NO_IRQ with 0.
> > That change shouldn't break anything, except those drivers which are 1)
> > being passed an actual IRQ #0 and 2) testing for no IRQ. I suspect that
> > those conditions aren't very common together.
> To clarify, you're suggesting that the meanings of all other IRQ values
> would not change initially?
Initially, or even ever.
> (i.e., we remap HW irq 0, if there is one,
> to some other random number but have a 1:1 mapping for everything else).
> That could make sense as an approach.
You might notice that a true IRQ #0 passed to generic drivers is not
More information about the linux-arm-kernel