[RFC PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: imx: add pinmux imx core driver
Shawn Guo
shawn.guo at freescale.com
Tue Dec 6 04:42:04 EST 2011
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 07:49:42PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> +static struct pinmux_ops imx_pmx_ops = {
> + .list_functions = imx_pmx_list_funcs,
> + .get_function_name = imx_pmx_get_func_name,
> + .get_function_groups = imx_pmx_get_groups,
> + .enable = imx_pmx_enable,
> +};
The pinmux core code will check the pinmux_ops as below. !ops->disable
is one of the checking, while you do not have .disable hook.
int pinmux_check_ops(const struct pinmux_ops *ops)
{
/* Check that we implement required operations */
if (!ops->list_functions ||
!ops->get_function_name ||
!ops->get_function_groups ||
!ops->enable ||
!ops->disable)
return -EINVAL;
return 0;
}
[...]
> +static int __init imx_pmx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct imx_pmx *ipmx;
> + struct resource *res;
> + struct imx_pinctrl_info *info;
> + resource_size_t res_size;
> +
> + info = (struct imx_pinctrl_info *)pdev->id_entry->driver_data;
> + if (!info || !info->pins || !info->groups || !info->functions
> + || (info->maxpin > info->npins)) {
You must mean !(info->maxpin > info->npins) here?
Regards,
Shawn
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "wrong pinctrl info\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list