[PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver

Geert Uytterhoeven geert at linux-m68k.org
Mon Dec 5 13:15:46 EST 2011

On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 19:02, Dave Martin <dave.martin at linaro.org> wrote:
> Unfortunately, NO_IRQ is often not spelled "NO_IRQ".  It looks like the assumption
> "irq < 0 === no irq" may be quite a lot more widespread than "NO_IRQ === no irq".

Can we make irq unsigned, and hope the compiler catches all of them
(comparison always
false blah blah blah)?



Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list