[PATCH v5 1/4] regulator: helper routine to extract regulator_init_data
Thomas Abraham
thomas.abraham at linaro.org
Mon Dec 5 04:10:50 EST 2011
Hi Mark,
On 4 December 2011 21:24, Mark Brown
<broonie at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 06:51:23PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote:
>
>> For regulators that are not turned on by bootloader, and which require
>> 'apply_uV' constraint, is there any alternative for turning on the
>> regulator when using dt?
>
> If the regulator isn't software managed then always_on covers this - the
> regulator core will enable any always_on regulators that haven't been
> enabled already.
Thanks for the hint. I was trying to deal with a regulator that was
not software managed but also required the voltage level to be set to
certain level. That was possible with 'apply_uV' constraint in non-dt
case. Anyway, I have modified the code to manage the regulator and
this works fine in dt case as well without the 'apply_uV' constraint.
>
>> /* do we need to apply the constraint voltage */
>> - if (rdev->constraints->apply_uV &&
>> - rdev->constraints->min_uV == rdev->constraints->max_uV) {
>> + if ((rdev->constraints->apply_uV &&
>> + rdev->constraints->min_uV == rdev->constraints->max_uV) ||
>> + (!rdev->constraints->boot_on && rdev->constraints->always_on)) {
>> ret = _regulator_do_set_voltage(rdev,
>> rdev->constraints->min_uV,
>> rdev->constraints->max_uV);
>
> I'm not sure I understand the intended logic there. Voltage constraints
> and enable/disable constraints are orthogonal here.
Ok. I guess the above change is incorrect then.
Thanks,
Thomas.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list