[PATCH 0/2 v2] ARM: OMAP1: Fix dpll1 reprogramming related issues

Janusz Krzysztofik jkrzyszt at tis.icnet.pl
Fri Dec 2 12:02:24 EST 2011

On Friday 02 of December 2011 at 03:09:37, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt at tis.icnet.pl> [111201 11:38]:
> > After dpll1 reprogramming has been moved from setup_arch() to
> > kernel_init(), I've been observing several issues, resulting in
> > undesired system behaviour on my Amstrad Delta. This series fixes
> > those most important (2/5 and 5/5 v2 previously), with a "stuck at 60MHz
> > rate" issue going to be fixed with Tony's proposed solution instead of
> > my previous 3/5.
> > 
> > Janusz Krzysztofik (2):
> >   ARM: OMAP1: Fix ckctl value used for dpll1 defualt rate
> >   ARM: OMAP1: recalculate loops per jiffy after dpll1 reprogram
> > 
> >  arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock_data.c |    9 +++++++--
> >  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> Thanks, got these three patches now applied into fixes on top of -rc4.
> Can you please try it out to make sure it's all working for you now?

Yes, it works as expected, re-tested with a custom 150 MHz rate only 
.config to the extent possible without removing all rates form .config 
/ omap1_rate_table[], i.e., without triggering the issue addressed by 
fc92dd3a77bfc59822f869627ba81a6418eed987 "ARM: OMAP1: Fix ckctl value 
used for dpll1 defualt rate". Can re-test other cases (omap1_defconfig, 
no rates selected at all) if required.

My only concern left, which I don't feel capable to justify myself, is 
if 6% inaccuracy in BogoMIPS recalculation, compared to the BogoMIPS 
value got either with 3.1 or as a result of recalibration, does matter 
and should still be addressed somehow for next merge window, or can be 

Russell, can you please share your opinion?


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list