[PATCH v3 3/5] clk: introduce the common clock framework
Mark Brown
broonie at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
Thu Dec 1 13:32:11 EST 2011
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:30:16AM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> So for example, if you had a driver that did:
> c = clk_get(dev, clk_name);
> clk_enable(c);
> clk_set_rate(c, clk_rate);
> and c was currently not enabled by any other driver on the system, and
> nothing else had called clk_block_rate_change(c), then the rate change
> would be allowed to proceed. (modulo any notifier activity, etc.)
> So clk_{allow,block}_rate_change() was simply intended to allow or
> restrict other users of the same clock, not the current user.
Ah, sorry! I'd totally misunderstood what you were proposing.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list