On Thursday 01 of December 2011 at 10:54:09, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: > > Anyway, did you mean resending those 2/5 and 5/5 without any changes, > only renumbered as 1/2 and 2/2? This was not a very clever question, sorry. Answering myself: 2/5 must be refreshed if not on top of 1/5. Thanks, Janusz