[PATCH v3 3/5] clk: introduce the common clock framework
Russell King - ARM Linux
linux at arm.linux.org.uk
Thu Dec 1 03:45:47 EST 2011
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 06:20:50PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> 1. When a clock user calls clk_enable() on a clock, the clock framework
> should prevent other users of the clock from changing the clock's rate.
> This should persist until the clock user calls clk_disable() (but see also
> #2 below). This will ensure that clock users can rely on the rate
> returned by clk_get_rate(), as long as it's called between clk_enable()
> and clk_disable(). And since the clock's rate is guaranteed to remain the
> same during this time, code that cannot tolerate clock rate changes
> without special handling (such as driver code for external I/O devices)
> will work safely without further modification.
So, if you have a PLL whose parent clock is not used by anything else.
You want to program it to a certain rate.
You call clk_disable() on the PLL clock. This walks up the tree and
disables the parent. You then try to set the rate using clk_set_rate().
clk_set_rate() in this circumstance can't wait for the PLL to lock
because it can't - there's no reference clock for it.
You then call clk_enable(). The PLL now takes its time to lock. You
can't sleep in clk_enable() because it might be called from atomic
contexts, so you have to spin waiting for this.
Overloading clk_disable/clk_enable in this way is a bad solution to
More information about the linux-arm-kernel