How to handle named resources with DT?

Shawn Guo shawn.guo at freescale.com
Fri Aug 12 00:10:17 EDT 2011


On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 11:37:10PM +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> On 8/9/2011 11:16 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> >On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 11:06:30PM +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> >>On 8/9/2011 10:55 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 07:47:20PM +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> >>>>On 8/9/2011 7:23 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> >>>>>On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Cousson, Benoit<b-cousson at ti.com>    wrote:
> >>>>>>Hi Manju,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>On 8/9/2011 6:29 PM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Hi Benoit,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 11:23:20AM +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Hi Grant,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Trying to bind hwmod informations with DT, I'm facing a little
> >>>>>>>>limitation.
> >>>>>>>>A bunch of drivers are using the platform_get_resource_byname, so
> >>>>>>>>the name for the resource is needed.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>The name is used so far for IORESOURCE_MEM, IORESOURCE_IRQ and
> >>>>>>>>IORESOURCE_DMA types of resources.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>IORESOURCE_MEM and IORESOURCE_IRQ's are fetched from dt blob and
> >>>>>>>it will be part of pdev.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Yes, but without the proper name in the resource structure. It will be then
> >>>>>>impossible to use the platform_get_resource_byname function that is
> >>>>>>currently used by a bunch of drivers.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>There is no analogous mechanism for _byname in the device tree.  The
> >>>>>DT binding for a device must explicitly state what order the register
> >>>>>ranges are in.  The driver will need to be adapted.
> >>>>
> >>>>That seems to be a small regression for my point of view. Relying on
> >>>>the order is not super safe. This is not very readable either.
> >>>>That's for that exact reason that we changed our drivers to use
> >>>>platform_get_resource_byname. That's probably the reason why that
> >>>>API is there as well.
> >>>>For the same IP, the number of entries can vary depending of the SoC
> >>>>revision.
> >>>>By using the _byname, we can check if the resource is there or not
> >>>>without having to care about the position.
> >>>
> >>>We've done it that way for a very long time with the device tree.  If
> >>>you want to do something by name, then propose a binding that will
> >>>make it work alongside the existing scheme.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>For IORESOURCE_DMA, you can have property
> >>>>>>>"dma-channel" in dtsi file and fetch dma-channel in driver probe
> >>>>>>>through "of_property_read_u32()" api.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>That will not be enough to get the name. So maybe something like:
> >>>>>>        dmas =<12>, "rx_req",<13>, "tx_req";
> >>>>>>will be doable.
> >>>>>>The issue is that the name is optional so managing the multiple entries
> >>>>>>might be tricky.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>DMA channels will never show up in the resource structure anyway.
> >>>>
> >>>>Can you elaborate on that point? AFAIK, IORESOURCE_DMA is already
> >>>>used today.
> >>>
> >>>IORESOURCE_DMA is a Linux construct, as is IORESOURCE_IRQ and
> >>>IORESOURCE_MEM.  However, IRQ and MEM can be directly mapped from the
> >>>common 'reg' and 'interrupts' bindings used by pretty much all device
> >>>tree nodes.  Therefore common code can be written to translate MEM and
> >>>IRQ that will always work.  There is no such common binding in place
> >>>for DMA regions, so common setup code cannot do it transparently for
> >>>the device driver.
> >>
> >>OK, sure, I get your point now. I was thinking about a "potential"
> >>dma support from the core DT, since this is very similar to IRQ.
> >>
> >>Otherwise, we can do it OMAP specific if nobody else care about
> >>that. But I still think it should be useful for other platforms.
> >
It is definitely useful for other platforms, so please add the support
in DT core.

> >I think people care, and it will be a net win, but it does mean you
> >need do the work of crafting a binding that will work for a large
> >proportion of SoCs.
> 
When it comes out, I will happily test it on imx :)

> The devil is in the details, but the way the DMA lines are connected
> in OMAP is similar to IRQ lines, and maybe a little bit simpler.
> 
> So starting with a copy/paste of the of_irq file should be a good start.
> And then the issues will start:-)
> 

I had a conversation with Arnd as below.  Arnd has the concern on
multiple dma controllers.  So it is a question if we need to handle
multiple dma controllers like we do for multiple irq controllers.

--- quote ---
Shawn Guo:
> Then like that IRQ number is decoded and populated into IORESOURCE_IRQ
> by device tree infrastructural code, we can also do the same into
> IORESOURCE_DMA.  In that case, drivers do not need any code change for
> getting dma channel/event numbers from device tree, as
> platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_DMA) still works for them.

Arnd Bergmann:
But I really don't think there is value in using IORESOURCE_DMA for this.
We don't have the code to manage DMA resources for more than one DMA
controller AFAICT, and I think we should not add it. Globally
unique interrupt numbers cause us a lot of trouble and we go to great
lengths to fake them on modern devices. It would be much better
not to have them visible in the OS, and I don't want to add them to
a modern API like the dmaengine.
---

Regards,
Shawn




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list