[RFC PATCH 05/15] ARM: perf: move active_events into struct arm_pmu
Mark Rutland
mark.rutland at arm.com
Wed Apr 27 06:20:11 EDT 2011
This patch moves the active_events counter into struct arm_pmu, in
preparation for supporting multiple PMUs. This also moves
pmu_reserve_mutex, as it is used to guard accesses to active_events.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
---
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
index 438482f..9874395 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -82,6 +82,8 @@ struct arm_pmu {
const unsigned (*event_map)[PERF_COUNT_HW_MAX];
u32 raw_event_mask;
int num_events;
+ atomic_t active_events;
+ struct mutex reserve_mutex;
u64 max_period;
};
@@ -454,15 +456,15 @@ armpmu_reserve_hardware(void)
return 0;
}
-static atomic_t active_events = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(pmu_reserve_mutex);
-
static void
hw_perf_event_destroy(struct perf_event *event)
{
- if (atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock(&active_events, &pmu_reserve_mutex)) {
+ atomic_t *active_events = &armpmu->active_events;
+ struct mutex *pmu_reserve_mutex = &armpmu->reserve_mutex;
+
+ if (atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock(active_events, pmu_reserve_mutex)) {
armpmu_release_hardware();
- mutex_unlock(&pmu_reserve_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(pmu_reserve_mutex);
}
}
@@ -543,6 +545,7 @@ __hw_perf_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
static int armpmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
{
int err = 0;
+ atomic_t *active_events = &armpmu->active_events;
switch (event->attr.type) {
case PERF_TYPE_RAW:
@@ -556,15 +559,14 @@ static int armpmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
event->destroy = hw_perf_event_destroy;
- if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&active_events)) {
- mutex_lock(&pmu_reserve_mutex);
- if (atomic_read(&active_events) == 0) {
+ if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(active_events)) {
+ mutex_lock(&armpmu->reserve_mutex);
+ if (atomic_read(active_events) == 0)
err = armpmu_reserve_hardware();
- }
if (!err)
- atomic_inc(&active_events);
- mutex_unlock(&pmu_reserve_mutex);
+ atomic_inc(active_events);
+ mutex_unlock(&armpmu->reserve_mutex);
}
if (err)
@@ -613,6 +615,12 @@ static struct pmu pmu = {
.read = armpmu_read,
};
+static void __init armpmu_init(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
+{
+ atomic_set(&armpmu->active_events, 0);
+ mutex_init(&armpmu->reserve_mutex);
+}
+
/* Include the PMU-specific implementations. */
#include "perf_event_xscale.c"
#include "perf_event_v6.c"
@@ -718,6 +726,7 @@ init_hw_perf_events(void)
if (armpmu) {
pr_info("enabled with %s PMU driver, %d counters available\n",
armpmu->name, armpmu->num_events);
+ armpmu_init(armpmu);
perf_pmu_register(&pmu, "cpu", PERF_TYPE_RAW);
} else {
pr_info("no hardware support available\n");
--
1.7.0.4
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list