[RFC PATCH 01/12] ARM: gic: add per-cpu interrupt multiplexer
Marc Zyngier
marc.zyngier at arm.com
Tue Apr 26 05:08:16 EDT 2011
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:17:01 -0700
Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/common/gic.c b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
> > index e9c2ff8..60f8915 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/common/gic.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
> > @@ -42,6 +42,11 @@ struct gic_chip_data {
> > unsigned int irq_offset;
> > void __iomem *dist_base;
> > void __iomem *cpu_base;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_GIC_VPPI
> > + int ppi_base;
> > + int vppi_base;
> > + u16 nrppis;
> > +#endif
> > };
>
> Can you put some document around this struct? Mention that ppi_base,
> vppi_base and nrppis will be zero for non-primary gic.
Sure.
> > static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,
> > unsigned int irq_start)
> > {
> > - unsigned int gic_irqs, irq_limit, i;
> > + unsigned int gic_irqs, irq_limit, i, nrvppis = 0;
> > void __iomem *base = gic->dist_base;
> > u32 cpumask = 1 << smp_processor_id();
> > + u32 dist_ctr, nrcpus;
> >
> > cpumask |= cpumask << 8;
> > cpumask |= cpumask << 16;
> > @@ -278,11 +359,32 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,
> > * Find out how many interrupts are supported.
> > * The GIC only supports up to 1020 interrupt sources.
> > */
> > - gic_irqs = readl(base + GIC_DIST_CTR) & 0x1f;
> > - gic_irqs = (gic_irqs + 1) * 32;
> > + dist_ctr = readl(base + GIC_DIST_CTR);
> > + gic_irqs = ((dist_ctr & 0x1f) + 1) * 32;
> > if (gic_irqs > 1020)
> > gic_irqs = 1020;
> >
> > + /* Find out how many CPUs are supported (8 max). */
> > + nrcpus = ((dist_ctr >> 5) & 7) + 1;
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_GIC_VPPI
> > + /*
> > + * Nobody would be insane enough to use PPIs on a secondary
> > + * GIC, right?
> > + */
> > + if (gic == &gic_data[0]) {
> > + gic->nrppis = 16 - (irq_start % 16);
> > + gic->ppi_base = gic->irq_offset + 32 - gic->nrppis;
> > + nrvppis = gic->nrppis * nrcpus;
> > + } else {
> > + gic->ppi_base = 0;
> > + gic->vppi_base = 0;
> > + }
> > +#endif
> > +
> > + pr_info("Configuring GIC with %d sources (%d additional PPIs)\n",
> > + gic_irqs, nrvppis);
> > +
> > /*
> > * Set all global interrupts to be level triggered, active low.
> > */
> > @@ -312,17 +414,39 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,
> > * Limit number of interrupts registered to the platform maximum
> > */
> > irq_limit = gic->irq_offset + gic_irqs;
> > - if (WARN_ON(irq_limit > NR_IRQS))
> > + if (WARN_ON((irq_limit) > NR_IRQS))
> > irq_limit = NR_IRQS;
> >
> > /*
> > * Setup the Linux IRQ subsystem.
> > */
> > for (i = irq_start; i < irq_limit; i++) {
> > - irq_set_chip_and_handler(i, &gic_chip, handle_fasteoi_irq);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_GIC_VPPI
> > + if (nrvppis && gic_irq_is_ppi(gic, i))
> > + irq_set_chip_and_handler(i, &gic_chip, gic_handle_ppi);
> > + else
> > +#endif
> > + {
> > + irq_set_chip_and_handler(i, &gic_chip,
> > + handle_fasteoi_irq);
> > + set_irq_flags(i, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
> > + }
> > + irq_set_chip_data(i, gic);
> > + }
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_GIC_VPPI
> > + if (!nrvppis)
> > + goto out;
> > + gic->vppi_base = irq_alloc_descs(-1, 0, nrvppis, 0);
> > + if (unlikely(WARN_ON(gic->vppi_base < 0)))
> > + goto out;
> > + for (i = gic->vppi_base; i < (gic->vppi_base + nrvppis); i++) {
> > + irq_set_chip_and_handler(i, &gic_ppi_chip, handle_fasteoi_irq);
>
> Can we do with handle_percpu_irq instead of handle_fasteoi_irq?
Ah, very good point. Should work just fine. Thanks for the suggestion!
M.
--
I'm the slime oozin' out from your TV set...
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list