[PATCH v2 02/23] at91: Make Ethernet device common
Ryan Mallon
ryan at bluewatersys.com
Tue Apr 26 01:26:56 EDT 2011
On 04/26/2011 04:35 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 08:16 Tue 26 Apr , Ryan Mallon wrote:
>> On 04/22/2011 11:02 AM, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, April 20, 2011 10:42 PM, Ryan Mallon wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Replace the individual Ethernet device code for each at91 variant with
>>>> a single implementation in devices.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Mallon <ryan at bluewatersys.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at572d940hf.c | 4 +
>>>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at572d940hf_devices.c | 83 +++++++----------------
>>>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9.c | 4 +
>>>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9_devices.c | 103 ++++++++++------------------
>>>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200.c | 4 +
>>>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200_devices.c | 103 ++++++++++------------------
>>>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9260.c | 4 +
>>>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9260_devices.c | 104 +++++++++++------------------
>>>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263.c | 4 +
>>>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263_devices.c | 102 ++++++++++------------------
>>>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c | 4 +
>>>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45_devices.c | 108 +++++++++++-------------------
>>>> arch/arm/mach-at91/devices.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++
>>>> arch/arm/mach-at91/devices.h | 10 +++
>>>> 14 files changed, 309 insertions(+), 389 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at572d940hf.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at572d940hf.c
>>>> index a6b9c68..48c1ec2 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at572d940hf.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at572d940hf.c
>>>> @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
>>>> #include "generic.h"
>>>> #include "clock.h"
>>>>
>>>> +extern void at572d940hf_init_devices(void);
>>>
>>> You might consider moving this, and all the other similar externs, to the generic.h
>>> header. That's where all the other platform init functions are defined.
>>
>> I put the externs in the .c files since that is the only place they are
>> actually called from. What is the general consensus on this?
> no I do not want to 1000 of export function again
>
> with the new soc we do not need it anymore
Yes. In merging with your patch the init_devices function can become a
member of struct at91_soc, which removes this whole problem.
~Ryan
--
Bluewater Systems Ltd - ARM Technology Solution Centre
Ryan Mallon 5 Amuri Park, 404 Barbadoes St
ryan at bluewatersys.com PO Box 13 889, Christchurch 8013
http://www.bluewatersys.com New Zealand
Phone: +64 3 3779127 Freecall: Australia 1800 148 751
Fax: +64 3 3779135 USA 1800 261 2934
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list