[patch 00/16] arm: Replace arm sched_clock by clocksource based sched_clock
john stultz
johnstul at us.ibm.com
Mon Apr 25 15:10:49 EDT 2011
On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 09:27 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> 2011/4/23 Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de>:
>
> > Most of ARM sched_clocks is using the timekeeping clocksource as the
> > sched_clock. Only versatile uses a different clock for it, but there
> > is no real reason why it can't use the clocksource as well.
>
> Excellent patch set!
>
> > Another 650 lines gone :)
>
> Any reason why we can't simply move *all* of these to
> drivers/clocksource/* and proceed with consolidation there?
This gives me some pause, as having the clocksources in the platform
code makes it easier to know what platform needs to be tested when a
change is made. The rule so far has been if more then one arch can make
use of it, it should be moved to the drivers/clocksource dir. Otherwise,
leave it close to any arch specific code that manages the hardware.
> It must be a pain having to grep through the tree to find all of
> these (even though I bet you know them all by heart now).
Not sure if grepping backwards through config dependencies to see who
actually uses a specific clocksource would be easier. But I'll admit
that sharing code is likely more important.
thanks
-john
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list