[PATCH] ARM: futex: add SMP futex support when !CPU_USE_DOMAINS
Will Deacon
will.deacon at arm.com
Thu Apr 21 10:35:31 EDT 2011
Hi Nicolas,
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Will Deacon wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 13:58 +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > This patch uses the load/store exclusive instructions to add SMP futex
> > > support for ARM.
> > >
> > > Since the ARM architecture does not provide instructions for
> > > unprivileged exclusive memory accesses, we can only provide SMP futexes
> > > when CPU domain support is disabled.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm/include/asm/futex.h | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > > 1 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> >
> > Any comments on this patch? The LTP tests for {get,set}_robust_list seem
> > happy enough but any review would be welcome.
>
> I looked at http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/81847
> back then, and one issue I found with that version was the fact that the
> #ifdef condition were wrong (not depending on !CONFIG_CPU_USE_DOMAINS.
Yes, I only noticed that patch after I'd written my version. Actually,
after looking at the current state of the domains code, I don't understand
why we have CONFIG_CPU_USE_DOMAINS at all since the definition of __range_ok
checks the address regardless of domain usage.
> Your version looks better though, just by looking at the net amount of
> lines added.
Ha, that's certainly the metric of the moment! I might be able to make
the exception table macros cleaner by taking some labels as arguments,
but I'm not sure if it's worth it or not.
Cheers,
Will
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list