[PATCH 04/10] clk: implement parent pass through functions

Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de
Wed Apr 20 03:16:41 EDT 2011

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:54:21PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > +1 for letting the core enable/disable and prepare/unprepare the parent
> > > clocks. I scanned the different arm clock implementations and they all
> > > do it, except the ones which do not implement parents at all.
> > Then the question is if all do handle parents in the same way. (i.e.
> > in enable do parent first, in disable do child first?)
> That's not a question at all. Anything which does it the other way
> round is broken. Period.
I havn't checked, but I remember Jeremy not wanting to handle parents in
the generic part because he saw some differences.

Best regards

Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list