[PATCH v2 00/12] mmc: use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency

[anish singh]

On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Jae hoon Chung <jh80.chung at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Per..
>
> I'm applied your patch..and sent the patch about dw_mmc.c.
> I think good this approach..
>
Forlin,i too want to test this patch of yours but unfortunately i have
samsung board+SDHCI host controller so i guess i just need to write pre_req
and post_req functions and that would enable this(nonblock mmc request) on
my board.Hope i am right?

>
> Tested-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung at samsung.com>
>
> Regards,
> Jaehoon Chung
>
> 2011/4/9 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>:
> > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Per Forlin <per.forlin at linaro.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> The intention for introducing none blocking mmc requests is to minimize
> the
> >> time between a mmc request ends and another mmc request starts.
> >
> > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org> FWIW, I've looked at
> the
> > patches so many times I'm already blind for any remaining bugs...
> >
> > Yours,
> > Linus Walleij
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
>  > the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20110410/713621b5/attachment-0001.html>